Trolley investigation
3 years ago
How does Shakespeare prepare us for the firstMeeting of the lovers?
0
comments
Charin
-
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on How does Shakespeare prepare us for the firstMeeting of the lovers?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality How does Shakespeare prepare us for the firstMeeting of the lovers? paper right on time.
“From forth the fatal loins of these two foes, a pair of star cross’d lovers take their life with misadventur’d piteous overthrows doth with their death bury their parents strife”, The ancient grudge between the Montague’s and the Capulet’s, summed up in four lines. The play of tragedy created by Shakespeare of two lovers Romeo and Juliet who meet and fall in love. The first lines of the play, known as the prologue, tell the audience what happens in the play, Shakespeare has written it like this to hook the audience into wanting to watch the rest of the play.
In the opening scene there is a huge fight, this brings contrast to the next scene with Romeo in “ay me, sad hours seem long“ this scene is much more calm than the fight scene at the beginning of the play. The fuss on the stage with all the fighting is very different from the lovers meeting the fight scene also shows how big the feud between the two families is. This makes the audience enjoy the scene more, as all the fighting and commotion makes it a lot more engaging for the audience with all the excitement of a fight. In the first lines between Sampson and Gregory, the Capulet serving men, we find them boasting about how they shall fight with the Montague men, then have sex with the maids, “I will push the Montague’s men from the wall and thrust his maids to the wall.” This contrasts with Romeo’s character, as he doesn’t see women as sexual figures this makes the audience will have more empathy with Romeo’s character he will become our knight in shining armour. The hatred between the families portrayed in the fight, shows how Romeo and Juliet’s love is deeply forbidden, “My sword old Montague is come and flourishes his blade in spite of me”
“Thou villain Capulet! - hold me not let me go” The prince and Benvolio play the peacemakers in this scene “If you ever disturb our streets again your lives shall pay the forfeit of peace.” This line is one of the most dramatically ironic in the play, as Romeo and Juliet do indeed take their lives and due to this tragedy the two families become united once again, the audience realise that this line has a dramatic undertone as they know that Romeo and Juliet will ultimately lose their lives.
The early Romeo is indeed a very different person from the man he becomes towards the end of the play, he is very confused about his love for Rosaline and Shakespeare shows this with Romeo’s language, he often speaks in oxymorons, “O brawling love, O brawling hate.” He uses broken sentences to show that Romeo is depressed about his love for Rosaline, as in fact she is a Capulet and he knows their love would be forbidden. “In sadness cousin, I do love a women.” When he meets Juliet, he instantly forgets about Rosaline, this shows that the love between Romeo and Juliet is real “With Rosaline, my ghostly father? No; I have forgot that name, and that name’s woe.” Before he meets Juliet, he talks in oxymorons and broken sentences, but when he meets her, their lines form a sonnet (this is a traditional love poem with 14 lines with 10 syllables on each line) the audience also never meet Rosaline, because if they did they would be constantly comparing Romeo’s love for Juliet with Romeo’s supposed love for Rosaline.
In act 1 scene , Paris and Capulet are discussing that Juliet should marry Paris, but Capulet thinks Juliet is too young to marry, “My child is yet a stranger in the world.” Yet Paris convinces him that younger people than her are married and are “happy mothers” Capulet relents and agrees to go ahead with the wedding. The audience are then worried that Juliet may marry Paris and forget all about Romeo, when they really want her to marry Romeo and be happy. Once they have decided that Juliet should be married, Lady Capulet talks to Juliet about it. Juliet has a very different approach towards love and marriage at this point in the play. Her first meeting with Romeo could be likened to love at first sight. Whereas, when her mother asks her how she feels about marriage in act 1 scene , she doesn’t actually want to be married yet, “It is and honour I dream not of.” This scene is a distracting one as it shows us that Juliet’s love for Romeo will never actually go right. This is another technique of Shakespeare’s to make the audience realise that the lovers will never have a “happy ending.” Many women in Elizabethan times got married a lot younger than today, as it was thought that the younger they are married the more children they could produce. Also, life expectancy in those, days was a lot shorter, with most women living to an average of 0 years old.
Shakespeare has included the character of Mercutio to show a vast contrast between the two men and their attitudes to love; this contrast enhances the deep feelings of love between Romeo and Juliet. Mercutio hates women and thinks of them only as sexual objects, merely to be used to satisfy his own sexual needs. “If love be rough with you, be rough with love.” This contrasts with Romeos opinion of love drastically. His attitude towards dreams and love, are far different from Mercutio’s. This makes Mercutio a dramatic interesting character for the audience to watch as they often wonder how Romeo would chose a friendship with someone like Mercutio as the audience would wonder if perhaps romeo was a bad judge of character or indeed he only saw the good in everyone. Mercutio is often a burden to Romeo’s true feelings dies so early in the play so that the audience can focus on the lovers. In Baz Luhrman’s version of Romeo and Juliet the director decides to dress Mercutio in women’s clothing, and directs him to act like a women. This emphasises Mercutio’s hatred of women he acts almost as if he is mocking the way women dress and act. Romeo is far different from this and sees women as humans and not things only put on this earth for childbirth. Mercutio’s character is in the play to add more drama to the lovers meeting, Romeo is scared to tell Mercutio that he loves Juliet because he knows that he will mock him for it. “Romeo! Humours! Madman! Passion! Lover!”
Shakespeare’s use of oxymorons when Juliet speaks, dramatically enhances how confused our young lover has become, ”My only love, sprung from my only hate.” After Romeo meets Juliet his choice of language and actions become more positive. The two characters become separated from the rest of the play and this is emphasised by the form of verse in which they have begun to speak.
Tybalt hates Romeo and wants him dead because he turned up at the Capulet ball and Tybalt was looking for a fight then and there, but his uncle Capulet stopped him “He shall be endur’d. What, Goodman boy, I say he shall, go to!” this brings suspense and irony to the play, as once Romeo has married Juliet Tybalt will become Romeos cousin. This makes Romeo and Juliet’s relationship even more dramatic. “Uncle this is a Montague, our foe”
At this point, the audience are eager to view the meeting of the lovers; at last they get to see what happens when they do meet. To make it even more dramatic, Shakespeare uses a number of techniques to set the meeting of the two lovers; he makes Romeo and Juliet’s speech into a sonnet. Also it has a lot of references to religion in their first speech. Shakespeare is hinting towards marriage in the meeting scene; Shakespeare also makes the audience feel sympathy for the pair, as they must be careful with their forbidden love because of the two houses hatred for each other. Of course we know that their love will never be happy, as from the prologue the audience are told that the young lovers both die, from this tragedy both families are reunited in their grief “O brother Montague, give me thy hand. This is my daughter’s jointure, for no more can I demand.”
Please note that this sample paper on How does Shakespeare prepare us for the firstMeeting of the lovers? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on How does Shakespeare prepare us for the firstMeeting of the lovers?, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on How does Shakespeare prepare us for the firstMeeting of the lovers? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in How does Shakespeare prepare us for the firstMeeting of the lovers?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your How does Shakespeare prepare us for the firstMeeting of the lovers? paper at affordable prices with !
“From forth the fatal loins of these two foes, a pair of star cross’d lovers take their life with misadventur’d piteous overthrows doth with their death bury their parents strife”, The ancient grudge between the Montague’s and the Capulet’s, summed up in four lines. The play of tragedy created by Shakespeare of two lovers Romeo and Juliet who meet and fall in love. The first lines of the play, known as the prologue, tell the audience what happens in the play, Shakespeare has written it like this to hook the audience into wanting to watch the rest of the play.
In the opening scene there is a huge fight, this brings contrast to the next scene with Romeo in “ay me, sad hours seem long“ this scene is much more calm than the fight scene at the beginning of the play. The fuss on the stage with all the fighting is very different from the lovers meeting the fight scene also shows how big the feud between the two families is. This makes the audience enjoy the scene more, as all the fighting and commotion makes it a lot more engaging for the audience with all the excitement of a fight. In the first lines between Sampson and Gregory, the Capulet serving men, we find them boasting about how they shall fight with the Montague men, then have sex with the maids, “I will push the Montague’s men from the wall and thrust his maids to the wall.” This contrasts with Romeo’s character, as he doesn’t see women as sexual figures this makes the audience will have more empathy with Romeo’s character he will become our knight in shining armour. The hatred between the families portrayed in the fight, shows how Romeo and Juliet’s love is deeply forbidden, “My sword old Montague is come and flourishes his blade in spite of me”
“Thou villain Capulet! - hold me not let me go” The prince and Benvolio play the peacemakers in this scene “If you ever disturb our streets again your lives shall pay the forfeit of peace.” This line is one of the most dramatically ironic in the play, as Romeo and Juliet do indeed take their lives and due to this tragedy the two families become united once again, the audience realise that this line has a dramatic undertone as they know that Romeo and Juliet will ultimately lose their lives.
The early Romeo is indeed a very different person from the man he becomes towards the end of the play, he is very confused about his love for Rosaline and Shakespeare shows this with Romeo’s language, he often speaks in oxymorons, “O brawling love, O brawling hate.” He uses broken sentences to show that Romeo is depressed about his love for Rosaline, as in fact she is a Capulet and he knows their love would be forbidden. “In sadness cousin, I do love a women.” When he meets Juliet, he instantly forgets about Rosaline, this shows that the love between Romeo and Juliet is real “With Rosaline, my ghostly father? No; I have forgot that name, and that name’s woe.” Before he meets Juliet, he talks in oxymorons and broken sentences, but when he meets her, their lines form a sonnet (this is a traditional love poem with 14 lines with 10 syllables on each line) the audience also never meet Rosaline, because if they did they would be constantly comparing Romeo’s love for Juliet with Romeo’s supposed love for Rosaline.
In act 1 scene , Paris and Capulet are discussing that Juliet should marry Paris, but Capulet thinks Juliet is too young to marry, “My child is yet a stranger in the world.” Yet Paris convinces him that younger people than her are married and are “happy mothers” Capulet relents and agrees to go ahead with the wedding. The audience are then worried that Juliet may marry Paris and forget all about Romeo, when they really want her to marry Romeo and be happy. Once they have decided that Juliet should be married, Lady Capulet talks to Juliet about it. Juliet has a very different approach towards love and marriage at this point in the play. Her first meeting with Romeo could be likened to love at first sight. Whereas, when her mother asks her how she feels about marriage in act 1 scene , she doesn’t actually want to be married yet, “It is and honour I dream not of.” This scene is a distracting one as it shows us that Juliet’s love for Romeo will never actually go right. This is another technique of Shakespeare’s to make the audience realise that the lovers will never have a “happy ending.” Many women in Elizabethan times got married a lot younger than today, as it was thought that the younger they are married the more children they could produce. Also, life expectancy in those, days was a lot shorter, with most women living to an average of 0 years old.
Shakespeare has included the character of Mercutio to show a vast contrast between the two men and their attitudes to love; this contrast enhances the deep feelings of love between Romeo and Juliet. Mercutio hates women and thinks of them only as sexual objects, merely to be used to satisfy his own sexual needs. “If love be rough with you, be rough with love.” This contrasts with Romeos opinion of love drastically. His attitude towards dreams and love, are far different from Mercutio’s. This makes Mercutio a dramatic interesting character for the audience to watch as they often wonder how Romeo would chose a friendship with someone like Mercutio as the audience would wonder if perhaps romeo was a bad judge of character or indeed he only saw the good in everyone. Mercutio is often a burden to Romeo’s true feelings dies so early in the play so that the audience can focus on the lovers. In Baz Luhrman’s version of Romeo and Juliet the director decides to dress Mercutio in women’s clothing, and directs him to act like a women. This emphasises Mercutio’s hatred of women he acts almost as if he is mocking the way women dress and act. Romeo is far different from this and sees women as humans and not things only put on this earth for childbirth. Mercutio’s character is in the play to add more drama to the lovers meeting, Romeo is scared to tell Mercutio that he loves Juliet because he knows that he will mock him for it. “Romeo! Humours! Madman! Passion! Lover!”
Shakespeare’s use of oxymorons when Juliet speaks, dramatically enhances how confused our young lover has become, ”My only love, sprung from my only hate.” After Romeo meets Juliet his choice of language and actions become more positive. The two characters become separated from the rest of the play and this is emphasised by the form of verse in which they have begun to speak.
Tybalt hates Romeo and wants him dead because he turned up at the Capulet ball and Tybalt was looking for a fight then and there, but his uncle Capulet stopped him “He shall be endur’d. What, Goodman boy, I say he shall, go to!” this brings suspense and irony to the play, as once Romeo has married Juliet Tybalt will become Romeos cousin. This makes Romeo and Juliet’s relationship even more dramatic. “Uncle this is a Montague, our foe”
At this point, the audience are eager to view the meeting of the lovers; at last they get to see what happens when they do meet. To make it even more dramatic, Shakespeare uses a number of techniques to set the meeting of the two lovers; he makes Romeo and Juliet’s speech into a sonnet. Also it has a lot of references to religion in their first speech. Shakespeare is hinting towards marriage in the meeting scene; Shakespeare also makes the audience feel sympathy for the pair, as they must be careful with their forbidden love because of the two houses hatred for each other. Of course we know that their love will never be happy, as from the prologue the audience are told that the young lovers both die, from this tragedy both families are reunited in their grief “O brother Montague, give me thy hand. This is my daughter’s jointure, for no more can I demand.”
Please note that this sample paper on How does Shakespeare prepare us for the firstMeeting of the lovers? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on How does Shakespeare prepare us for the firstMeeting of the lovers?, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on How does Shakespeare prepare us for the firstMeeting of the lovers? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
In The Time of the Butterflies
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on In The Time of the Butterflies. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality In The Time of the Butterflies paper right on time.
In the Time of the Butterflies
An old Native American folk-tale states,if you have a secret wish, capture a butterfly and whisper your wish to it. Since butterflies cannot speak, your secret is ever safe in their keeping. Release the butterfly, and it will carry your wish to the Great Spirit, who alone knows the thoughts of butterflies. By setting the butterfly free, you are helping to restore the balance of nature, and your wish will surely be granted.1 The butterfly, in the case of In the Time of the Butterflies, is symbolic in a similar nature.
The butterflies represent the freedom associated with the Minerva sister’s movement. Butterflies are silent, beautiful creatures who goes through a tremendous metamorphosis, from caterpillar to butterfly. A symbol of transformation, it leaves the safety of the cocoon to make its way on its own. Anyone who is experiencing a major change, or social revolution, could be aptly symbolized as a butterfly. “The butterfly is a reminder to make changes when the opportunity arises. Change and transformation are inevitable for us all, but it does not have to be traumatic. Butterfly symbolism is also closely tied to the idea of spirits and souls. It has been used in many religions and cultures. Psyche is the Greek word for both soul and butterfly. The belief was that butterflies were human souls searching for a new reincarnation, which gave the creature uncanny and sometimes ominous connotations.” In the case of the Minerva sisters, they are searching for a way to overcome the social injustices they are forced to endure. Minerva, in particular, is looking for reformation � to change an inherently inhuman and unjust political structure.
Another connection between the butterflies and the story of the Minerva sisters lies in other typical historical associations. In early Christianity, it was believed that by swallowing a butterfly, women would be come impregnated. It was commonly believed that butterflies floated in search of a new mother. “Other cultures believed that spirits of the dead took the form of white butterflies. In northern Europe to see one flying at night was a warning of death, and some said that the soul-butterflys ability to leave the body in sleep accounts for dreams.” Maribel Minerva did, in fact, have a child during the plot of the story. This is another exampled of the symbolic nature of the butterfly.
Finally, the idea of “leaving the cocoon,” symbolically represents the leaving home of the Minerva sisters. As each goes out on their own, they have goals that they attempt to achieve. By leaving the cocoon, or trying to achieve their goals, they become more beautiful than they were before. The sister’s desire for political change and their moral uprightness fosters a new attitude and culture that is represented in the “freeing of the butterflies.” While the sisters are trapped in prison, they can be compared to butterflies that have been caught. They are seeking freedom, not only from jail, but from the dictatorship of el Jefe.
In In the Time of the Butterflies, the butterfly is symbolic of transformation and political and social revolution. As the Minerva sisters transform from caterpillars to beautiful butterflies, great strides are made in bringing about social change.
Please note that this sample paper on In The Time of the Butterflies is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on In The Time of the Butterflies, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on In The Time of the Butterflies will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in In The Time of the Butterflies, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your In The Time of the Butterflies paper at affordable prices with !
In the Time of the Butterflies
An old Native American folk-tale states,if you have a secret wish, capture a butterfly and whisper your wish to it. Since butterflies cannot speak, your secret is ever safe in their keeping. Release the butterfly, and it will carry your wish to the Great Spirit, who alone knows the thoughts of butterflies. By setting the butterfly free, you are helping to restore the balance of nature, and your wish will surely be granted.1 The butterfly, in the case of In the Time of the Butterflies, is symbolic in a similar nature.
The butterflies represent the freedom associated with the Minerva sister’s movement. Butterflies are silent, beautiful creatures who goes through a tremendous metamorphosis, from caterpillar to butterfly. A symbol of transformation, it leaves the safety of the cocoon to make its way on its own. Anyone who is experiencing a major change, or social revolution, could be aptly symbolized as a butterfly. “The butterfly is a reminder to make changes when the opportunity arises. Change and transformation are inevitable for us all, but it does not have to be traumatic. Butterfly symbolism is also closely tied to the idea of spirits and souls. It has been used in many religions and cultures. Psyche is the Greek word for both soul and butterfly. The belief was that butterflies were human souls searching for a new reincarnation, which gave the creature uncanny and sometimes ominous connotations.” In the case of the Minerva sisters, they are searching for a way to overcome the social injustices they are forced to endure. Minerva, in particular, is looking for reformation � to change an inherently inhuman and unjust political structure.
Another connection between the butterflies and the story of the Minerva sisters lies in other typical historical associations. In early Christianity, it was believed that by swallowing a butterfly, women would be come impregnated. It was commonly believed that butterflies floated in search of a new mother. “Other cultures believed that spirits of the dead took the form of white butterflies. In northern Europe to see one flying at night was a warning of death, and some said that the soul-butterflys ability to leave the body in sleep accounts for dreams.” Maribel Minerva did, in fact, have a child during the plot of the story. This is another exampled of the symbolic nature of the butterfly.
Finally, the idea of “leaving the cocoon,” symbolically represents the leaving home of the Minerva sisters. As each goes out on their own, they have goals that they attempt to achieve. By leaving the cocoon, or trying to achieve their goals, they become more beautiful than they were before. The sister’s desire for political change and their moral uprightness fosters a new attitude and culture that is represented in the “freeing of the butterflies.” While the sisters are trapped in prison, they can be compared to butterflies that have been caught. They are seeking freedom, not only from jail, but from the dictatorship of el Jefe.
In In the Time of the Butterflies, the butterfly is symbolic of transformation and political and social revolution. As the Minerva sisters transform from caterpillars to beautiful butterflies, great strides are made in bringing about social change.
Please note that this sample paper on In The Time of the Butterflies is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on In The Time of the Butterflies, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on In The Time of the Butterflies will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
haha
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on haha. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality haha paper right on time.
In the future, I plan to acquire a degree in law and ethics or maybe some kind of businessman.
I hope to continue my education at the university. A successful career is very important for my future. I hope one day that I have a financially secure job that is enjoyable and where I can earn some money. I think that a place like the University in Copenhagen can help me with some of my dreams, and of cause the academy in Sorø.
I have many thoughts about my favourite jobs.
A police officer was one of my first ideas, because I have always dreamed about to carry a gun and a uniform. But the job wasn’t well-paid enough. I have always used a lot of money, and that’s a big problem. I need to have the newest car and the biggest house when I get older, surely because I’m a luxury kid.
I’m interested in politics, but not enough to be a political. I’m also very interested in human rights and justice, so that’s why I have made some thoughts being a lawyer. But also money and trading have crossed my mind.
My future may not be as clear as I would like it to be, but I hope that my school and my family can help me in the career which is good for me.
I think that a higher education is vital to a person’s future.
not so many words but aleast ones....im sorry come again later!
In diesen Moment wies die Polizei doch nicht was passiert in der Bank. Einige tot und sieben Geiseln. „Das Geld! Schnell!“ Schrieet Uwe. Keine Reaktion aus den Bankpersonale. Sie sah nur an den Bankkaufmann. Er schasst eine neue Frau. Sie wird in dem Bein geschasst. Alle erwachten.
Ein Bankassistent versuchtet jetzt die Bankbox zu öffnen. Er fummelte mit den Schlüsseln. „Schnell“ � rief Uwe. Der Box wird jetzt öffnen. Der Bankassistent lag das Geld in einen großen schwatzen Sack. Wenn der Bande beschäftigen mit dem Geld zu nehmen, eine andere Person betätigte den Alarm.
Der Bande wird jetzt in Panik. Per nahm den Hinterausgang. Sie lief aus der Bank.
Sirenen in der Ferne.
Please note that this sample paper on haha is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on haha, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on haha will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in haha, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your haha paper at affordable prices with !
In the future, I plan to acquire a degree in law and ethics or maybe some kind of businessman.
I hope to continue my education at the university. A successful career is very important for my future. I hope one day that I have a financially secure job that is enjoyable and where I can earn some money. I think that a place like the University in Copenhagen can help me with some of my dreams, and of cause the academy in Sorø.
I have many thoughts about my favourite jobs.
A police officer was one of my first ideas, because I have always dreamed about to carry a gun and a uniform. But the job wasn’t well-paid enough. I have always used a lot of money, and that’s a big problem. I need to have the newest car and the biggest house when I get older, surely because I’m a luxury kid.
I’m interested in politics, but not enough to be a political. I’m also very interested in human rights and justice, so that’s why I have made some thoughts being a lawyer. But also money and trading have crossed my mind.
My future may not be as clear as I would like it to be, but I hope that my school and my family can help me in the career which is good for me.
I think that a higher education is vital to a person’s future.
not so many words but aleast ones....im sorry come again later!
In diesen Moment wies die Polizei doch nicht was passiert in der Bank. Einige tot und sieben Geiseln. „Das Geld! Schnell!“ Schrieet Uwe. Keine Reaktion aus den Bankpersonale. Sie sah nur an den Bankkaufmann. Er schasst eine neue Frau. Sie wird in dem Bein geschasst. Alle erwachten.
Ein Bankassistent versuchtet jetzt die Bankbox zu öffnen. Er fummelte mit den Schlüsseln. „Schnell“ � rief Uwe. Der Box wird jetzt öffnen. Der Bankassistent lag das Geld in einen großen schwatzen Sack. Wenn der Bande beschäftigen mit dem Geld zu nehmen, eine andere Person betätigte den Alarm.
Der Bande wird jetzt in Panik. Per nahm den Hinterausgang. Sie lief aus der Bank.
Sirenen in der Ferne.
Please note that this sample paper on haha is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on haha, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on haha will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
Glass Menagrie
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Glass Menagrie. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Glass Menagrie paper right on time.
.
“The Glass Menagerie,” written by Tennessee William, portrays a struggling American family’s incapability to grasp life’s reality. “The Glass Menagerie” is a memory play narrated by the protagonist, Tom Wingfield. The play is very renowned and lauded in numerous modern theaters and Broadway. William’s approach of the play being seen and recognized as a past occurrence creates an illusion. This illusion assists on the portrayal of his characters’ internal conflict of not being able to accept life’s reality. Without the characters, the play’s illusion is ineffective.
Tom Wingfield is an essential character of “The Glass Menagerie.” Tom is a round and contradicting character. He yearns for the escape from his family and warehouse job, but can never find the strength or approach. In the play, Tom talks about his dream of escaping his family for adventure. He is unable to accept his responsibilities of working in a warehouse just to help support his family. Through the events of the play, frustration grows. Tom is saddened and angered because his accountability for his family enables him to live his life the way he wants to. He tries to escape his problems by constantly going out to the movies, drinking, and wandering around doing miscellaneous things. Doing these things prevents Tom from grasping the way his life really is. They help him dream and drift away from his responsibility; his reality of life.
Amanda Wingfield is the mother. She can be seen as the antagonist because of the internal conflict she causes to her children with her demands and high standard she sets for them. Amanda is incredibly unable to grasp her reality of life in many ways. In the play, she frequently reminisces about her amazing and rich life as a young maiden; her rich past conflicts with her poor present lifestyle. She also persists her daughter’s as a flawless individual, when truly her daughter is an odd and cripple young women. These deceptions cause Amanda to want and need things she is unable to get or do not have.
Laura Wingfield is the sister of Tom and daughter of Amanda. Laura is portrayal in the play is very different. She does not cause any conflict, purposely, like the others. Laura is a very shy and an odd young lady. Her shyness plays a big component for her disconnection to the world; she is isolated from the people outside her family. So, all she knows is her family. Laura’s glass menagerie is where the title of play arises. Her mini glass figures help her escape from her family’s altercations and uncomfortable situations. Laura really does not have any responsibility in the family. Her mother takes care of her and her brother watches over her. For this reason, she lives in their illusion of life.
Tennessee William’s represented his theme through his characters in the play. Tom, Amanda, and Laura Wingfield lived a life full of conflict because they are unable to accept what they have, who they are, and where life has brought them. William’s idea of placing the play in a memory setting is ingenious. It helps the reader or viewers to recognize an illusion of an already done reality. “The Glass Menagerie” theme of incapability of accepting life’s reality is greatly understood through the character’s portrayal in the play. If the characters were to be taken out, the play’s theme would be incomprehensible.
Please note that this sample paper on Glass Menagrie is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Glass Menagrie, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Glass Menagrie will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Glass Menagrie, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Glass Menagrie paper at affordable prices with !
.
“The Glass Menagerie,” written by Tennessee William, portrays a struggling American family’s incapability to grasp life’s reality. “The Glass Menagerie” is a memory play narrated by the protagonist, Tom Wingfield. The play is very renowned and lauded in numerous modern theaters and Broadway. William’s approach of the play being seen and recognized as a past occurrence creates an illusion. This illusion assists on the portrayal of his characters’ internal conflict of not being able to accept life’s reality. Without the characters, the play’s illusion is ineffective.
Tom Wingfield is an essential character of “The Glass Menagerie.” Tom is a round and contradicting character. He yearns for the escape from his family and warehouse job, but can never find the strength or approach. In the play, Tom talks about his dream of escaping his family for adventure. He is unable to accept his responsibilities of working in a warehouse just to help support his family. Through the events of the play, frustration grows. Tom is saddened and angered because his accountability for his family enables him to live his life the way he wants to. He tries to escape his problems by constantly going out to the movies, drinking, and wandering around doing miscellaneous things. Doing these things prevents Tom from grasping the way his life really is. They help him dream and drift away from his responsibility; his reality of life.
Amanda Wingfield is the mother. She can be seen as the antagonist because of the internal conflict she causes to her children with her demands and high standard she sets for them. Amanda is incredibly unable to grasp her reality of life in many ways. In the play, she frequently reminisces about her amazing and rich life as a young maiden; her rich past conflicts with her poor present lifestyle. She also persists her daughter’s as a flawless individual, when truly her daughter is an odd and cripple young women. These deceptions cause Amanda to want and need things she is unable to get or do not have.
Laura Wingfield is the sister of Tom and daughter of Amanda. Laura is portrayal in the play is very different. She does not cause any conflict, purposely, like the others. Laura is a very shy and an odd young lady. Her shyness plays a big component for her disconnection to the world; she is isolated from the people outside her family. So, all she knows is her family. Laura’s glass menagerie is where the title of play arises. Her mini glass figures help her escape from her family’s altercations and uncomfortable situations. Laura really does not have any responsibility in the family. Her mother takes care of her and her brother watches over her. For this reason, she lives in their illusion of life.
Tennessee William’s represented his theme through his characters in the play. Tom, Amanda, and Laura Wingfield lived a life full of conflict because they are unable to accept what they have, who they are, and where life has brought them. William’s idea of placing the play in a memory setting is ingenious. It helps the reader or viewers to recognize an illusion of an already done reality. “The Glass Menagerie” theme of incapability of accepting life’s reality is greatly understood through the character’s portrayal in the play. If the characters were to be taken out, the play’s theme would be incomprehensible.
Please note that this sample paper on Glass Menagrie is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Glass Menagrie, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Glass Menagrie will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE.
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE.. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE. paper right on time.
IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE.
Narrative techniques are the different ways in which a writer tells their story.
Ask yourself the following questions about how the story of The Handmaid’s Tale is told
Is it all first-person narration? What are the advantages of this technique for the reader? Is it autobiographical? Is it genuine autobiography, or fictive autobiography? Is the story told in the same way all the way through? Does the story flow in a straightforward, easily understood style? Are we told the name of our narrator immediately? Does the story emerge in a fragmented, bit-by-bit, way? Could it be deliberately confusing? Are there different narrators? Are we allowed into the narrator’s own thoughts? Do we discover much about the narrator’s past? How? What id the effect of using flashbacks?
POINTS TO CONSIDER
· Is the first person narration significant? What is the effect of it for the reader?
· Why are the epigraphs important? Why are they there? What do they add?
· Does the novel begin in a clear, easily understood way? Or, is there some deliberate confusion (narrative puzzle emerges / many ideas of time are presented � both the recent and distant past / effect is to place the story in the recent future)?
· How are the ‘Night’ sections (chapters 1,7 & 18) different from other parts of the novel? Think of what Offred does and why.
· The use of time shifts and flashbacks
· The fragmentation of the storytelling, it is only revealed bit by bit
· The comments made by Offred about the act of storytelling itself � C7, C & (directly addresses the audience for the first time)
· The ‘double’ motifs � see class notes 6--0
· The Historical Notes at the end of the book explain why Offred’s story has been told in such a fragmented way. It was pieced together, from Offred’s original tape recordings by the academic professors. This explains, and justifies, the fragmented style of storytelling to the reader. Of course, this style of storytelling, of only partial disclosure, suits Atwood’s purpose as a storyteller, of presenting the story gradually. Also, Atwood deliberately wants to show Offred as a distressed and confused narrator; the fragmented storytelling, where Offred cannot concentrate on the dreadful present for too long without recourse to the preferable past, reinforces the idea of Offred’s distress. Therefore, Atwood’s narrative style aids her presentation of Offred as a distressed and discontented woman.
NIGHT
Night recurs as a heading seven times. It always signals ‘time out’ when Offred’s life is not under public scrutiny, and when she can escape into her own private world of memory and desire
TIME SHIFTS AND FLASHBACKS
Mostly within the ‘Night’ sections where the flashbacks are most sustained
The narrative switches often, between the past, present and distant past, juxtaposing past and present, through Offred’s memories.
Creates a continuing sense of the physical and emotional confusion Offred feels because she has to escape her present
The ubiquitous past brings happiness, comfort and power to keep fighting, but it also brings despair, longing and loneliness EFFECT IS to increase the reader’s empathy for Offred as they are all emotions that we can relate to
By using memory, we see Offred ‘feel’ � ‘stream of consciousness’ technique seeks to replicate real thought processes and jumps from one subject to another
Like a palimpsest, a parchment that is scraped clean to be used again, traces of Offred’s original identity and beliefs still exist beneath her Handmaid guise
THE FRAGMENTATION OF THE STORYTELLING
A discontinuous, spasmodic narrative, with frequent time shifts & short scenes � effect is
to create narrative puzzle / reflect Offred’s confusion & distress / represents the complex ways that memory works, where the present moment is always pervaded / affected by other times & places
The story shifts abruptly from one scene to another, from present to past time so the narrator’s present situation and past history are only gradually revealed
We have to piece together and reconstruct the story
The story starts in a confusing manner with unfamiliar surroundings, although the setting does become more familiar
Offred’s story pieces together the voice of the powerless and oppressed in Gilead it is only revealed bit by bit
THE COMMENTS MADE ABOUT THE ACT OF STORYTELLING
A self-conscious narrator who is aware of the limitations of narrating stories and the human need for telling stories
Storytelling (onto tape) is the only possible gesture against the silences of death and of history � it is an act of rebellion in itself
DOUBLES MOTIF
IN LITERATURE, A MOTIF IS A RECURRING, DOMINANT IDEA
Double life - both her physical existence and in her memories
Two identities � Handmaid and being an individual in her own right � wife, mother, daughter
Two names � birth names and her Gileadean patronynic
Offred & Ofglen look alike as they shop together
Characters have their own counterparts � Nick and Luke; Moira and Ofglen; Offred and the previous Offred
Please note that this sample paper on IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE. is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE., we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE. will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE., therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE. paper at affordable prices with !
IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE.
Narrative techniques are the different ways in which a writer tells their story.
Ask yourself the following questions about how the story of The Handmaid’s Tale is told
Is it all first-person narration? What are the advantages of this technique for the reader? Is it autobiographical? Is it genuine autobiography, or fictive autobiography? Is the story told in the same way all the way through? Does the story flow in a straightforward, easily understood style? Are we told the name of our narrator immediately? Does the story emerge in a fragmented, bit-by-bit, way? Could it be deliberately confusing? Are there different narrators? Are we allowed into the narrator’s own thoughts? Do we discover much about the narrator’s past? How? What id the effect of using flashbacks?
POINTS TO CONSIDER
· Is the first person narration significant? What is the effect of it for the reader?
· Why are the epigraphs important? Why are they there? What do they add?
· Does the novel begin in a clear, easily understood way? Or, is there some deliberate confusion (narrative puzzle emerges / many ideas of time are presented � both the recent and distant past / effect is to place the story in the recent future)?
· How are the ‘Night’ sections (chapters 1,7 & 18) different from other parts of the novel? Think of what Offred does and why.
· The use of time shifts and flashbacks
· The fragmentation of the storytelling, it is only revealed bit by bit
· The comments made by Offred about the act of storytelling itself � C7, C & (directly addresses the audience for the first time)
· The ‘double’ motifs � see class notes 6--0
· The Historical Notes at the end of the book explain why Offred’s story has been told in such a fragmented way. It was pieced together, from Offred’s original tape recordings by the academic professors. This explains, and justifies, the fragmented style of storytelling to the reader. Of course, this style of storytelling, of only partial disclosure, suits Atwood’s purpose as a storyteller, of presenting the story gradually. Also, Atwood deliberately wants to show Offred as a distressed and confused narrator; the fragmented storytelling, where Offred cannot concentrate on the dreadful present for too long without recourse to the preferable past, reinforces the idea of Offred’s distress. Therefore, Atwood’s narrative style aids her presentation of Offred as a distressed and discontented woman.
NIGHT
Night recurs as a heading seven times. It always signals ‘time out’ when Offred’s life is not under public scrutiny, and when she can escape into her own private world of memory and desire
TIME SHIFTS AND FLASHBACKS
Mostly within the ‘Night’ sections where the flashbacks are most sustained
The narrative switches often, between the past, present and distant past, juxtaposing past and present, through Offred’s memories.
Creates a continuing sense of the physical and emotional confusion Offred feels because she has to escape her present
The ubiquitous past brings happiness, comfort and power to keep fighting, but it also brings despair, longing and loneliness EFFECT IS to increase the reader’s empathy for Offred as they are all emotions that we can relate to
By using memory, we see Offred ‘feel’ � ‘stream of consciousness’ technique seeks to replicate real thought processes and jumps from one subject to another
Like a palimpsest, a parchment that is scraped clean to be used again, traces of Offred’s original identity and beliefs still exist beneath her Handmaid guise
THE FRAGMENTATION OF THE STORYTELLING
A discontinuous, spasmodic narrative, with frequent time shifts & short scenes � effect is
to create narrative puzzle / reflect Offred’s confusion & distress / represents the complex ways that memory works, where the present moment is always pervaded / affected by other times & places
The story shifts abruptly from one scene to another, from present to past time so the narrator’s present situation and past history are only gradually revealed
We have to piece together and reconstruct the story
The story starts in a confusing manner with unfamiliar surroundings, although the setting does become more familiar
Offred’s story pieces together the voice of the powerless and oppressed in Gilead it is only revealed bit by bit
THE COMMENTS MADE ABOUT THE ACT OF STORYTELLING
A self-conscious narrator who is aware of the limitations of narrating stories and the human need for telling stories
Storytelling (onto tape) is the only possible gesture against the silences of death and of history � it is an act of rebellion in itself
DOUBLES MOTIF
IN LITERATURE, A MOTIF IS A RECURRING, DOMINANT IDEA
Double life - both her physical existence and in her memories
Two identities � Handmaid and being an individual in her own right � wife, mother, daughter
Two names � birth names and her Gileadean patronynic
Offred & Ofglen look alike as they shop together
Characters have their own counterparts � Nick and Luke; Moira and Ofglen; Offred and the previous Offred
Please note that this sample paper on IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE. is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE., we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on IDENTIFY, AND THEN COMMENT UPON, THE VARIETY OF NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES, IN THE HANDMAID’S TALE. will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
Incident report
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Incident report. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Incident report paper right on time.
MUGS
1 Tuas Lane, Jurong Town Singapore 68610
Tel (65) 861 5444 Fax (65) 861 4777
httpwww.mugs.com.sg
To Henry Davidson Date October 0, 00
Director
From Chua Jan Subject Delivery delay on
October 0, 00
DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT
At 1.0 P.M. on October 0, 00, our distributor, Mrs. Jenny Huang called and said that our gThe Barbarian Mugsh (BM 040 Model) cannot be accepted. After receiving the call, I went down to the distributor shop and inspected the glass mugs delivered. I found that about 80% of the glass mugs were broken. After checking the delivery truck, I found that the wheels of the delivery truck were still in relatively good condition, except for some sand and scratch marks. The weather is fine that day with little clouds.
After I had finished inspecting the goods and truck at .00 P.M., I arranged for the broken glass mugs to be sent back to our company. I notified Head of Manufacturing Department, Manager Lai Seng Boon to check if there was still spare stock of our gThe Barbarian Mugsh in our inventory that could be sent to Mrs. Huang. I also notified the head of delivery department, Manager Choo Boon Heng, to send another delivery truck to our distributor shop to send the broken glasses back to our factory and to replace them with the new batch of glass mugs. While waiting for the truck to arrive, I apologized to Mrs. Huang and promised that the new batch of glasses would arrive by 5.00 P.M. The truck arrived with the new batch of glasses at 4.0P.M.
By 5.00 P.M. we had finished unloading the new glasses and load the broken glass onto the truck. The remaining glasses, which were fine, were left at the shop.
CAUSES OF INCIDENT
The glass mugs were packed in brown boxes without cushioning. The mugs were found to be arranged in a haphazard manner and the strings used to tie them were of unsuitable material. Nylon strings should have been used instead of polyester threads. It was evident that the proper tying techniques were not used to tie the glass mugs. A single knot was used instead of the double knots. As shown in figure 1.1, you can see the wrong type of knot used to tie the package. Figure 1. shows the correct double knot to be used, for better strength to hold our carton together.
Fig 1.1 Wrong tying method
Fig 1. Correct tying method
It was the peak hour and the road was congested. Thus, our truck driver, Mr. Ang See Chong, in his bid to get the glass mugs to our distributor in the fastest possible time, drove at a higher speed. Moreover, the delivery route from our Tuas factory to our distributorfs shop in 40 Jalan Peminpin, #0-0 Tat An Building, had to pass through rough terrain, full of coarse sand. So, the high speed and jerky movement might have caused the glass mugs to bang into one another and resulted in them breaking.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In order to prevent such an incident from happening again in the future, I have made the following recommendations.
1. Have our packaging executive conduct a training course for our packaging staff about proper packaging procedure and methods. The above incident can be used as a case study for the course.
. Order specially marked and design boxes. These medium size boxes 1 X 1X , which are made of tough corrugated cardboard with wire-stitched seams, are extra durable and weight 1kg each. Each box can safely hold up 5 kg of our goods, about twice the load of our previous brown boxes and help us to track our packages easily. Cushions are also included in the boxes to withstand the jerky movement.
Please note that this sample paper on Incident report is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Incident report, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Incident report will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Incident report, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Incident report paper at affordable prices with !
MUGS
1 Tuas Lane, Jurong Town Singapore 68610
Tel (65) 861 5444 Fax (65) 861 4777
httpwww.mugs.com.sg
To Henry Davidson Date October 0, 00
Director
From Chua Jan Subject Delivery delay on
October 0, 00
DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT
At 1.0 P.M. on October 0, 00, our distributor, Mrs. Jenny Huang called and said that our gThe Barbarian Mugsh (BM 040 Model) cannot be accepted. After receiving the call, I went down to the distributor shop and inspected the glass mugs delivered. I found that about 80% of the glass mugs were broken. After checking the delivery truck, I found that the wheels of the delivery truck were still in relatively good condition, except for some sand and scratch marks. The weather is fine that day with little clouds.
After I had finished inspecting the goods and truck at .00 P.M., I arranged for the broken glass mugs to be sent back to our company. I notified Head of Manufacturing Department, Manager Lai Seng Boon to check if there was still spare stock of our gThe Barbarian Mugsh in our inventory that could be sent to Mrs. Huang. I also notified the head of delivery department, Manager Choo Boon Heng, to send another delivery truck to our distributor shop to send the broken glasses back to our factory and to replace them with the new batch of glass mugs. While waiting for the truck to arrive, I apologized to Mrs. Huang and promised that the new batch of glasses would arrive by 5.00 P.M. The truck arrived with the new batch of glasses at 4.0P.M.
By 5.00 P.M. we had finished unloading the new glasses and load the broken glass onto the truck. The remaining glasses, which were fine, were left at the shop.
CAUSES OF INCIDENT
The glass mugs were packed in brown boxes without cushioning. The mugs were found to be arranged in a haphazard manner and the strings used to tie them were of unsuitable material. Nylon strings should have been used instead of polyester threads. It was evident that the proper tying techniques were not used to tie the glass mugs. A single knot was used instead of the double knots. As shown in figure 1.1, you can see the wrong type of knot used to tie the package. Figure 1. shows the correct double knot to be used, for better strength to hold our carton together.
Fig 1.1 Wrong tying method
Fig 1. Correct tying method
It was the peak hour and the road was congested. Thus, our truck driver, Mr. Ang See Chong, in his bid to get the glass mugs to our distributor in the fastest possible time, drove at a higher speed. Moreover, the delivery route from our Tuas factory to our distributorfs shop in 40 Jalan Peminpin, #0-0 Tat An Building, had to pass through rough terrain, full of coarse sand. So, the high speed and jerky movement might have caused the glass mugs to bang into one another and resulted in them breaking.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In order to prevent such an incident from happening again in the future, I have made the following recommendations.
1. Have our packaging executive conduct a training course for our packaging staff about proper packaging procedure and methods. The above incident can be used as a case study for the course.
. Order specially marked and design boxes. These medium size boxes 1 X 1X , which are made of tough corrugated cardboard with wire-stitched seams, are extra durable and weight 1kg each. Each box can safely hold up 5 kg of our goods, about twice the load of our previous brown boxes and help us to track our packages easily. Cushions are also included in the boxes to withstand the jerky movement.
Please note that this sample paper on Incident report is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Incident report, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Incident report will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
him
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on him. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality him paper right on time.
Perhaps it was because he saw her on her own turf, he saw how she worked and behaved in her true role as daughter and eldest child in the household; as a student and a friend; as a caregiver and a pacifier. In the morning he witnessed Kagome interjecting herself into an argument that stemmed from the fact that an unknown youkai sleeping on the couch (even though he wasn’t asleep, it was an alert rest, where pure rest was never accomplished to its fullest extent) and where she performed beautifully in his defense even though yesterday she was less than happy to have him here. He saw her help her brother with a math problem before he went off to school, he saw her clean the dishes from which they eat upon and he saw her discuss, somewhat less energetically than her grandfather, about whether traditional miko robes were as important as the training itself; the heavy garment acting as a discipline in itself for you had to walk upright with the heavy material clinging to your body. And perhaps it was because she seemed to smile more and laugh more when she was with her family, how it seemed so natural for her to conduct her life full of emotions and happiness. Or finally perhaps it was that Sesshomaru was finally realizing that she wasn’t such a bad human anyway. Well, perhaps it was easier for him to admit that because she wasn’t truly human. He had to keep reminding himself that she was immortal now as well, and somewhere in the vicinity of his chest ached a bit when he realized that her family wasn’t. Would she have to leave them in the future as she spent five hundred years in the past? Or will she abandon the shards and Inuyasha to begin her immortal life in this era? He tried to ignore the feeling that was again in the general vicinity of his chest when he thought of the idea of spending five hundred years without her. Forget the miko wench! The sword will call you to her whenever is necessary and you’ll see her often enough! Get a hold of yourself! A woman? Why would you ever want a woman to accompany you? Sesshomaru shifted his arm a little as he turned his head to glance the other way, away from the window where he had been staring at the miko quite openly. It is just time I took a mate, he thought, although he knew that propriety called for him to finish this…business with the miko before he could even consider a mate. He continued writing, another little amusement that came from the experiences he had here.
She wasnt normal. Neither was she brave nor courageous. But her stamina was not to be tested. And that is what he did. The glittering pieces were all lined up in a row at the beginning; the black and white board sheen with a kind of cheery glow of anticipation. It was a board that had been used many times, through many games and many players.
But now it was almost empty. An annoyed finger lightly tapped on the side of the board, anger permeating from the nails scratching at the surface. But the game wore on.
The board saw death to pieces. The carnage lay strewn on each side of the board. No one was speaking, the deadly silence emanated from the room to create a certain sound of its own; the complete opposite of noise. The board lost track of all time, all notion of existence. The world, for a moment, was suspended on air--the players alone to concentrate on a battle of wit and integrity. But there is always one winner.
She knew that her stamina was almost to a breaking point�never before had this occurred. But she competed. No one ever got better by playing someone inferior. He seemed to be the kind of person she would have liked to have known outside of their game, perhaps meeting him at a bar or through mutual friends. He played for the game too, but she knew it was over now. She knew that the ultimate outcome lay in her favor. It wasnt because she was superior. It was because she had played more than he had. Her skills were sharper�something that only resulted from recent and determined practice. Perhaps on another court he would be the winner.
She delicately moved her knight to rest beside his king. She didnt have to say it, but she said it anyway, out of habit
Checkmate.
He laid down his king honorably. Slowly he got up, shaking her hand politely, not saying a word. As he walked away he turned back to her still sitting in her chair. From about seven feet away he shook his head as if in disbelief. And then he grinned. A Cheshire cat grin. And as he turned back and walked away she knew he was still grinning.
Sesshomaru grumbled a little as he reread what he wrote. It was always the same now�he wrote of a woman, a woman who reminded him of Kagome, and yet, the woman did not think like her. Instead he seemed to pour his feelings and perceptions into the woman; he seemed to make her feel what he was feeling and what he thought. Writing always seemed to be able to explain his mood better than he could and he didn’t like the way this was shaping up to be. Did he really want to know Kagome as someone other than his brother’s miko and an annoyance that involved his sword and her jewel? Did he want to continue this haphazard relationship and develop it into something more? Into something more than it already was? And what exactly did more mean? But the most important question was�
Please note that this sample paper on him is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on him, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on him will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in him, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your him paper at affordable prices with !
Perhaps it was because he saw her on her own turf, he saw how she worked and behaved in her true role as daughter and eldest child in the household; as a student and a friend; as a caregiver and a pacifier. In the morning he witnessed Kagome interjecting herself into an argument that stemmed from the fact that an unknown youkai sleeping on the couch (even though he wasn’t asleep, it was an alert rest, where pure rest was never accomplished to its fullest extent) and where she performed beautifully in his defense even though yesterday she was less than happy to have him here. He saw her help her brother with a math problem before he went off to school, he saw her clean the dishes from which they eat upon and he saw her discuss, somewhat less energetically than her grandfather, about whether traditional miko robes were as important as the training itself; the heavy garment acting as a discipline in itself for you had to walk upright with the heavy material clinging to your body. And perhaps it was because she seemed to smile more and laugh more when she was with her family, how it seemed so natural for her to conduct her life full of emotions and happiness. Or finally perhaps it was that Sesshomaru was finally realizing that she wasn’t such a bad human anyway. Well, perhaps it was easier for him to admit that because she wasn’t truly human. He had to keep reminding himself that she was immortal now as well, and somewhere in the vicinity of his chest ached a bit when he realized that her family wasn’t. Would she have to leave them in the future as she spent five hundred years in the past? Or will she abandon the shards and Inuyasha to begin her immortal life in this era? He tried to ignore the feeling that was again in the general vicinity of his chest when he thought of the idea of spending five hundred years without her. Forget the miko wench! The sword will call you to her whenever is necessary and you’ll see her often enough! Get a hold of yourself! A woman? Why would you ever want a woman to accompany you? Sesshomaru shifted his arm a little as he turned his head to glance the other way, away from the window where he had been staring at the miko quite openly. It is just time I took a mate, he thought, although he knew that propriety called for him to finish this…business with the miko before he could even consider a mate. He continued writing, another little amusement that came from the experiences he had here.
She wasnt normal. Neither was she brave nor courageous. But her stamina was not to be tested. And that is what he did. The glittering pieces were all lined up in a row at the beginning; the black and white board sheen with a kind of cheery glow of anticipation. It was a board that had been used many times, through many games and many players.
But now it was almost empty. An annoyed finger lightly tapped on the side of the board, anger permeating from the nails scratching at the surface. But the game wore on.
The board saw death to pieces. The carnage lay strewn on each side of the board. No one was speaking, the deadly silence emanated from the room to create a certain sound of its own; the complete opposite of noise. The board lost track of all time, all notion of existence. The world, for a moment, was suspended on air--the players alone to concentrate on a battle of wit and integrity. But there is always one winner.
She knew that her stamina was almost to a breaking point�never before had this occurred. But she competed. No one ever got better by playing someone inferior. He seemed to be the kind of person she would have liked to have known outside of their game, perhaps meeting him at a bar or through mutual friends. He played for the game too, but she knew it was over now. She knew that the ultimate outcome lay in her favor. It wasnt because she was superior. It was because she had played more than he had. Her skills were sharper�something that only resulted from recent and determined practice. Perhaps on another court he would be the winner.
She delicately moved her knight to rest beside his king. She didnt have to say it, but she said it anyway, out of habit
Checkmate.
He laid down his king honorably. Slowly he got up, shaking her hand politely, not saying a word. As he walked away he turned back to her still sitting in her chair. From about seven feet away he shook his head as if in disbelief. And then he grinned. A Cheshire cat grin. And as he turned back and walked away she knew he was still grinning.
Sesshomaru grumbled a little as he reread what he wrote. It was always the same now�he wrote of a woman, a woman who reminded him of Kagome, and yet, the woman did not think like her. Instead he seemed to pour his feelings and perceptions into the woman; he seemed to make her feel what he was feeling and what he thought. Writing always seemed to be able to explain his mood better than he could and he didn’t like the way this was shaping up to be. Did he really want to know Kagome as someone other than his brother’s miko and an annoyance that involved his sword and her jewel? Did he want to continue this haphazard relationship and develop it into something more? Into something more than it already was? And what exactly did more mean? But the most important question was�
Please note that this sample paper on him is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on him, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on him will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
Gatsby--persuasive
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Gatsby--persuasive. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Gatsby--persuasive paper right on time.
In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel, The Great Gatsby, Nick’s claim that Gatsby turned out to be all right is true because Gatsby cared about other people, knew how to love, and openly as well as freely shared his wealth. Nick was able to support his conclusion because Gatsby sincerely had compassion for other people. Fitzgerald provides numerous examples of Gatsby’s true care, causing it to be quite prevalent throughout the novel. Gatsby’s knowledge of how to love is a significant reason why Nick was able to advocate his proclamation. This wisdom is an important component in the basis of the novel, and Fitzgerald continuously uses it to portray Gatsby’s true character. A final and substantial reason why Nick was able to validate his statement that Gatsby turned out all right in the end is that Gatsby generously shared his prosperity. Fitzgerald uses both Gatsby’s true care and knowledge of how to have love for others in the formation of Gatsby’s ability to share his wealth. Nick, being a benevolent person himself, could detect the true heart of Gatsby and his genuine compassion for others.
Nick was able to validate his statement that Gatsby turned out all right in the end because he genuinely had compassion for other people. Upon obtaining his wealth, Gatsby made sure that his parents’ needs were adequately taken care of. He furnished a new home for them, and he made certain that they never lived in destitution. During one of Gatsby’s extravagant parties at his home, a young woman tore her dress on a chair. Gatsby truly cared enough about the woman, as well as the inconvenience the furniture in his home caused her, that he acquired her name along with her address and sent her a package with a new evening gown inside. Gatsby also showed his care for others by being kind to strangers regardless of their financial circumstances. For example, even though Nick was not as wealthy as Gatsby was, Gatsby welcomed him with a sincere heart. Along with many other things, he invited Nick to his parties, took him out to lunch, encouraged him to use his beach, and went hydroplaning with him. Also at one of his lavish parities, Gatsby was unexpectedly called to the telephone during a conversation. Instead of rising and hurrying out of the room to answer the call immediately, Gatsby kindly excused himself with polite words and a small bow that included each person he was speaking to in the conversation. Gatsby’s compassion for his guests’ feelings was displayed through his benevolent manner. He cared enough about them to considerately leave the room. However, he was also sensitive to the telephone caller’s feelings and time; he did not keep the person waiting to speak with him on the phone lingering too long. This is yet another example of how Fitzgerald illustrated Gatsby’s truly caring manner. When Gatsby requested that Nick invite Daisy to his home, he knew that he was making use of Nick’s bigheartedness. He did not want to inconvenience him in anyway, so Gatsby sent the servants and gardener from his mansion to prepare Nick’s home. Gatsby was also a very understanding man. He displayed an especially sympathetic attitude, which is an indication of a caring person. For example, when Nick first met Gatsby, he did not realize that the man he was talking to about Gatsby was in fact Gatsby. When Nick found this out, he was rather embarrassed, but Gatsby rid him of his discomfiture with an understanding smile. Nick described it as “one of those rare smiles with a quality of eternal reassurance in it” (Fitzgerald 48). Gatsby could have been extremely rude to Nick about the mistake; however he disregarded it and showed his incredibly understanding personality through his smile. A final example of Gatsby’s genuine compassion for others is in how much he cared for and about Daisy. Gatsby sincerely cared so much that he changed his life for her. He went from being a poor farm boy to a wealthy and high-class man, just to have a chance at gaining Daisy’s love. This is true devotion and consideration, which F. Scott Fitzgerald skillfully developed in Gatsby. This development also stretched into giving Gatsby the ability to know how to love.
Gatsby’s knowledge of how to love is another reason Nick was able to confirm his statement that Gatsby turned out all right in the end. Gatsby was so deeply committed to Daisy that he changed himself just so he could have a chance with her. He knew that she was exceedingly wealthy, and this posed a problem. Gatsby did not have a great deal of money, and during the time of the novel, it was unheard-of for an aristocrat to get involved with a poor individual. Consequently, Gatsby used his military uniform to hide his penniless background and worked to gain money so that Daisy would consider him an equal. This shows that Gatsby genuinely knew how to love because he was willing to exert himself to secure it. Gatsby waited for Daisy and followed her social career. This is another indication that he knew how to love because he cherished her enough to stay devoted to her, and only her, even if they were separated. However, Daisy did not wait for him, and after Gatsby discovered that she had needed security and married while he was overseas, “he found that he had committed himself to the following of a grail” (Fitzgerald 14). Gatsby was seeking the inner completeness, just as those in search of the grail were, and he knew that Daisy’s love was the only thing that could provide this wholeness. Comparable to how the grail rested on the peak of a mountain, encircled by water and obstacles that only a select few could overcome, Daisy’s love also rested far away, and there were many hurdles that Gatsby needed to clear in the pursuit of her love. The protection that he offered her is a final and significant example of Gatsby’s true knowledge of how to love. He wanted to keep her from any harm that could come into her life. Gatsby was so devoted to Daisy that he was willing to give up his life to spare her the least amount of pain or suffering. For instance, Gatsby chose to take the blame for the collision between Myrtle and the car that Daisy was driving, which instantaneously caused Myrtle’s death. He was willing to endure any punishment, persecution, or notoriety that came with this liability. He did not wish to see her hurt in any way. Gatsby not only provided mental and emotional protection, but physical protection as well. On the night of the afternoon in which Daisy confessed that she never loved Tom, Gatsby was willing to wait outside Daisy’s house all night to make sure that Tom did not hurt or bother her about the unpleasantness of the day. And even when Nick tried to assure Gatsby that Tom was not even thinking about her, he would not leave. He did not want to put Daisy in any sort of situation where danger could be inflicted on her, even if there was not a threat. This is true passion and devotion, proof that Gatsby knew how to love. Gatsby’s care for others and knowledge of how to love also extended into his finances; having these characteristics, Gatsby openly and freely shared his wealth.
Gatsby’s ability to openly and freely share his wealth was a substantial reason why Nick was able to support his conclusion that Gatsby turned out all right in the end. Gatsby was not selfish with his money; he did not keep it all for his own pleasurable uses. In fact, he expended a great amount of his money for people whom he did not even know. He hosted incessant and extravagant summer parties; he was rarely familiar with any of the guests because they simply invited themselves and were welcomed merely for attending. He wanted people to enjoy themselves in the midst of his prosperity. Thus the food, entertainment, hospitality, and all of the other aspects of Gatsby’s parties were incredibly lavish
Every Friday five crates of oranges and lemons arrived from a fruiterer in New York�every Monday these same oranges and lemons left his back door in a pyramid of pulpless halves. . . .
At least once a fortnight a corps of caterers came down with several hundred feet of canvas and enough colored lights to make a Christmas tree of Gatsby’s enormous garden. On buffet tables, garnished with glistening hors-d’�uvre, spiced baked hams crowded against salads of harlequin designs and pastry pigs and turkeys bewitched to a dark gold. In the main hall a bar with a real brass rail was set up, and stocked with gins and liquors and with cordials so long forgotten that most of his female guests were too young to know one from another.
By seven o’clock the orchestra has arrived, no thin five-piece affair, but a whole pitful of oboes and trombones and saxophones and viols and cornets and piccolos, and low and high drums. The last swimmers have come in from the beach now and are dressing up-stairs; the cars from New York are parked five deep in the drive, and already the halls and salons and verandas are gaudy with primary colors, and hair shorn in strange new ways, and shawls beyond the dreams of Castile. The bar is in full swing, and floating rounds of cocktails permeate the garden outside, until the air is alive with chatter and laughter, and casual innuendo and introductions forgotten on the spot, and enthusiastic meetings between women who never knew each other’s names. (Fitzgerald -40)
Gatsby opened his home to his unfamiliar guests and allowed them to eat his food until they were satisfied, drink as much of his liquor as they wished, and dance as long as they desired to the music of the orchestras he provided. This truly illustrates that he was a man who unreservedly shared his wealth. Not only did Gatsby share his wealth through his summer parties, he shared it with those around him everyday. For example, on pages 10 and 10 of his novel, Fitzgerald displayed Gatsby’s daily sharing of wealth by directing it toward the group of people that arrived at his home on horseback. Although the group was rather rude to him, Gatsby still acted politely and exhibited earnest hospitality. He offered them a cigarette or a cigar as well as something to drink; he encouraged them to stay for supper and accepted their self-invitation to come to his next party. Gatsby could have turned the group away; instead, he opened his home and prosperity to them. He also exhibited his free sharing of wealth by offering Nick a side job to help him out with his finances. Gatsby was aware that Nick did not make a great deal of money, and he wanted to lend a hand by sharing some of his assets. The fact that Nick did not have an abundance of riches enabled him to see that Gatsby did not have an aristocratic attitude; this provided support for his claim that Gatsby ended up to be an acceptable individual.
Nick’s statement that Gatsby turned out to be an acceptable individual in the end of The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, is relevant because Gatsby showed compassion toward other people, understood how to love, and generously shared his wealth. With the various examples Fitzgerald provides throughout the novel, it is effortless to see that Gatsby sincerely cared for other people. This is one rationale that Nick used to support his claim that Gatsby turned out all right. Fitzgerald created Gatsby as a man who truly had a heartfelt knowledge of how to love, and it was through Gatsby’s use of this wisdom that Nick was able to advocate his claim. A final reason he was able to do this was by taking into account Gatsby’s ability to openly and freely share his wealth. This ability showed Nick that Gatsby was not self-centered and only concerned with his own prosperity, but truly altruistic. Whether he was portrayed as altruistic, caring, or loving, I feel that Fitzgerald crafted Gatsby’s character well. He delayed the introduction of most of the information on Gatsby until relatively late in the novel, which helped to shape Gatsby as an individual. I think that Fitzgerald used this method to emphasize the theatrical quality of Gatsbys approach to life, which is an essential part of his personality. Fitzgerald allows Gatsby to literally fashion his own character; he has him change his name, from James Gatz to Jay Gatsby, which represents the recreation of himself. I believe that what gives Gatsby his quality of “greatness” is the gift of self-invention that Fitzgerald skillfully creates in him. I believe that it is this skill is what Fitzgerald used to superbly craft the character of Gatsby.
Works Cited
Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. New York Charles Scribner’s Sons, 15.
Please note that this sample paper on Gatsby--persuasive is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Gatsby--persuasive, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Gatsby--persuasive will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Gatsby--persuasive, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Gatsby--persuasive paper at affordable prices with !
In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel, The Great Gatsby, Nick’s claim that Gatsby turned out to be all right is true because Gatsby cared about other people, knew how to love, and openly as well as freely shared his wealth. Nick was able to support his conclusion because Gatsby sincerely had compassion for other people. Fitzgerald provides numerous examples of Gatsby’s true care, causing it to be quite prevalent throughout the novel. Gatsby’s knowledge of how to love is a significant reason why Nick was able to advocate his proclamation. This wisdom is an important component in the basis of the novel, and Fitzgerald continuously uses it to portray Gatsby’s true character. A final and substantial reason why Nick was able to validate his statement that Gatsby turned out all right in the end is that Gatsby generously shared his prosperity. Fitzgerald uses both Gatsby’s true care and knowledge of how to have love for others in the formation of Gatsby’s ability to share his wealth. Nick, being a benevolent person himself, could detect the true heart of Gatsby and his genuine compassion for others.
Nick was able to validate his statement that Gatsby turned out all right in the end because he genuinely had compassion for other people. Upon obtaining his wealth, Gatsby made sure that his parents’ needs were adequately taken care of. He furnished a new home for them, and he made certain that they never lived in destitution. During one of Gatsby’s extravagant parties at his home, a young woman tore her dress on a chair. Gatsby truly cared enough about the woman, as well as the inconvenience the furniture in his home caused her, that he acquired her name along with her address and sent her a package with a new evening gown inside. Gatsby also showed his care for others by being kind to strangers regardless of their financial circumstances. For example, even though Nick was not as wealthy as Gatsby was, Gatsby welcomed him with a sincere heart. Along with many other things, he invited Nick to his parties, took him out to lunch, encouraged him to use his beach, and went hydroplaning with him. Also at one of his lavish parities, Gatsby was unexpectedly called to the telephone during a conversation. Instead of rising and hurrying out of the room to answer the call immediately, Gatsby kindly excused himself with polite words and a small bow that included each person he was speaking to in the conversation. Gatsby’s compassion for his guests’ feelings was displayed through his benevolent manner. He cared enough about them to considerately leave the room. However, he was also sensitive to the telephone caller’s feelings and time; he did not keep the person waiting to speak with him on the phone lingering too long. This is yet another example of how Fitzgerald illustrated Gatsby’s truly caring manner. When Gatsby requested that Nick invite Daisy to his home, he knew that he was making use of Nick’s bigheartedness. He did not want to inconvenience him in anyway, so Gatsby sent the servants and gardener from his mansion to prepare Nick’s home. Gatsby was also a very understanding man. He displayed an especially sympathetic attitude, which is an indication of a caring person. For example, when Nick first met Gatsby, he did not realize that the man he was talking to about Gatsby was in fact Gatsby. When Nick found this out, he was rather embarrassed, but Gatsby rid him of his discomfiture with an understanding smile. Nick described it as “one of those rare smiles with a quality of eternal reassurance in it” (Fitzgerald 48). Gatsby could have been extremely rude to Nick about the mistake; however he disregarded it and showed his incredibly understanding personality through his smile. A final example of Gatsby’s genuine compassion for others is in how much he cared for and about Daisy. Gatsby sincerely cared so much that he changed his life for her. He went from being a poor farm boy to a wealthy and high-class man, just to have a chance at gaining Daisy’s love. This is true devotion and consideration, which F. Scott Fitzgerald skillfully developed in Gatsby. This development also stretched into giving Gatsby the ability to know how to love.
Gatsby’s knowledge of how to love is another reason Nick was able to confirm his statement that Gatsby turned out all right in the end. Gatsby was so deeply committed to Daisy that he changed himself just so he could have a chance with her. He knew that she was exceedingly wealthy, and this posed a problem. Gatsby did not have a great deal of money, and during the time of the novel, it was unheard-of for an aristocrat to get involved with a poor individual. Consequently, Gatsby used his military uniform to hide his penniless background and worked to gain money so that Daisy would consider him an equal. This shows that Gatsby genuinely knew how to love because he was willing to exert himself to secure it. Gatsby waited for Daisy and followed her social career. This is another indication that he knew how to love because he cherished her enough to stay devoted to her, and only her, even if they were separated. However, Daisy did not wait for him, and after Gatsby discovered that she had needed security and married while he was overseas, “he found that he had committed himself to the following of a grail” (Fitzgerald 14). Gatsby was seeking the inner completeness, just as those in search of the grail were, and he knew that Daisy’s love was the only thing that could provide this wholeness. Comparable to how the grail rested on the peak of a mountain, encircled by water and obstacles that only a select few could overcome, Daisy’s love also rested far away, and there were many hurdles that Gatsby needed to clear in the pursuit of her love. The protection that he offered her is a final and significant example of Gatsby’s true knowledge of how to love. He wanted to keep her from any harm that could come into her life. Gatsby was so devoted to Daisy that he was willing to give up his life to spare her the least amount of pain or suffering. For instance, Gatsby chose to take the blame for the collision between Myrtle and the car that Daisy was driving, which instantaneously caused Myrtle’s death. He was willing to endure any punishment, persecution, or notoriety that came with this liability. He did not wish to see her hurt in any way. Gatsby not only provided mental and emotional protection, but physical protection as well. On the night of the afternoon in which Daisy confessed that she never loved Tom, Gatsby was willing to wait outside Daisy’s house all night to make sure that Tom did not hurt or bother her about the unpleasantness of the day. And even when Nick tried to assure Gatsby that Tom was not even thinking about her, he would not leave. He did not want to put Daisy in any sort of situation where danger could be inflicted on her, even if there was not a threat. This is true passion and devotion, proof that Gatsby knew how to love. Gatsby’s care for others and knowledge of how to love also extended into his finances; having these characteristics, Gatsby openly and freely shared his wealth.
Gatsby’s ability to openly and freely share his wealth was a substantial reason why Nick was able to support his conclusion that Gatsby turned out all right in the end. Gatsby was not selfish with his money; he did not keep it all for his own pleasurable uses. In fact, he expended a great amount of his money for people whom he did not even know. He hosted incessant and extravagant summer parties; he was rarely familiar with any of the guests because they simply invited themselves and were welcomed merely for attending. He wanted people to enjoy themselves in the midst of his prosperity. Thus the food, entertainment, hospitality, and all of the other aspects of Gatsby’s parties were incredibly lavish
Every Friday five crates of oranges and lemons arrived from a fruiterer in New York�every Monday these same oranges and lemons left his back door in a pyramid of pulpless halves. . . .
At least once a fortnight a corps of caterers came down with several hundred feet of canvas and enough colored lights to make a Christmas tree of Gatsby’s enormous garden. On buffet tables, garnished with glistening hors-d’�uvre, spiced baked hams crowded against salads of harlequin designs and pastry pigs and turkeys bewitched to a dark gold. In the main hall a bar with a real brass rail was set up, and stocked with gins and liquors and with cordials so long forgotten that most of his female guests were too young to know one from another.
By seven o’clock the orchestra has arrived, no thin five-piece affair, but a whole pitful of oboes and trombones and saxophones and viols and cornets and piccolos, and low and high drums. The last swimmers have come in from the beach now and are dressing up-stairs; the cars from New York are parked five deep in the drive, and already the halls and salons and verandas are gaudy with primary colors, and hair shorn in strange new ways, and shawls beyond the dreams of Castile. The bar is in full swing, and floating rounds of cocktails permeate the garden outside, until the air is alive with chatter and laughter, and casual innuendo and introductions forgotten on the spot, and enthusiastic meetings between women who never knew each other’s names. (Fitzgerald -40)
Gatsby opened his home to his unfamiliar guests and allowed them to eat his food until they were satisfied, drink as much of his liquor as they wished, and dance as long as they desired to the music of the orchestras he provided. This truly illustrates that he was a man who unreservedly shared his wealth. Not only did Gatsby share his wealth through his summer parties, he shared it with those around him everyday. For example, on pages 10 and 10 of his novel, Fitzgerald displayed Gatsby’s daily sharing of wealth by directing it toward the group of people that arrived at his home on horseback. Although the group was rather rude to him, Gatsby still acted politely and exhibited earnest hospitality. He offered them a cigarette or a cigar as well as something to drink; he encouraged them to stay for supper and accepted their self-invitation to come to his next party. Gatsby could have turned the group away; instead, he opened his home and prosperity to them. He also exhibited his free sharing of wealth by offering Nick a side job to help him out with his finances. Gatsby was aware that Nick did not make a great deal of money, and he wanted to lend a hand by sharing some of his assets. The fact that Nick did not have an abundance of riches enabled him to see that Gatsby did not have an aristocratic attitude; this provided support for his claim that Gatsby ended up to be an acceptable individual.
Nick’s statement that Gatsby turned out to be an acceptable individual in the end of The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, is relevant because Gatsby showed compassion toward other people, understood how to love, and generously shared his wealth. With the various examples Fitzgerald provides throughout the novel, it is effortless to see that Gatsby sincerely cared for other people. This is one rationale that Nick used to support his claim that Gatsby turned out all right. Fitzgerald created Gatsby as a man who truly had a heartfelt knowledge of how to love, and it was through Gatsby’s use of this wisdom that Nick was able to advocate his claim. A final reason he was able to do this was by taking into account Gatsby’s ability to openly and freely share his wealth. This ability showed Nick that Gatsby was not self-centered and only concerned with his own prosperity, but truly altruistic. Whether he was portrayed as altruistic, caring, or loving, I feel that Fitzgerald crafted Gatsby’s character well. He delayed the introduction of most of the information on Gatsby until relatively late in the novel, which helped to shape Gatsby as an individual. I think that Fitzgerald used this method to emphasize the theatrical quality of Gatsbys approach to life, which is an essential part of his personality. Fitzgerald allows Gatsby to literally fashion his own character; he has him change his name, from James Gatz to Jay Gatsby, which represents the recreation of himself. I believe that what gives Gatsby his quality of “greatness” is the gift of self-invention that Fitzgerald skillfully creates in him. I believe that it is this skill is what Fitzgerald used to superbly craft the character of Gatsby.
Works Cited
Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. New York Charles Scribner’s Sons, 15.
Please note that this sample paper on Gatsby--persuasive is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Gatsby--persuasive, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Gatsby--persuasive will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
Women’s Freedom in Bahrain
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Women’s Freedom in Bahrain. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Women’s Freedom in Bahrain paper right on time.
Are women in Bahrain having enough freedom? They do have education; they do run for election and vote for elections. But is it enough?!
First let us see the religious side of it. Islam asked for education “seek knowledge even in China”. As we read the Quara’n, we can see it’s asking Muslims to have knowledge and education “teach your kids”. So education started long time ago. What was against religion is the co-ed education (which existed in Bahrain). Divorced women have custody of the boys (not in Islam) “children must go back to their father after the age of seven years”. A deluge (male) had to present women in court and ministries (not in Bahrain, but in Religion). Women do run her own properties, money and take care of her own business (the first wife of the prophet Khadija was a merchant running her business).
Second let us see women’s social life in Bahrain. In 10 there were given the right to vote for candidates. They have the right to be representative in the “Shoura” council. Women in Bahrain have the right to do any work she could mange it. There is no work restriction with male. Now a day some women are ministers of specific ministries in the government. They are not eliminated in society. They have almost the same rights that man has.
Bahrain is the first countries to give women’s rights. Some behavior was not in Islam, because people are following the modernization. Women are quiet happy in Bahrain for having there rights. But they are still asking for more political freedom.
Please note that this sample paper on Women’s Freedom in Bahrain is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Women’s Freedom in Bahrain, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Women’s Freedom in Bahrain will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Women’s Freedom in Bahrain, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Women’s Freedom in Bahrain paper at affordable prices with !
Are women in Bahrain having enough freedom? They do have education; they do run for election and vote for elections. But is it enough?!
First let us see the religious side of it. Islam asked for education “seek knowledge even in China”. As we read the Quara’n, we can see it’s asking Muslims to have knowledge and education “teach your kids”. So education started long time ago. What was against religion is the co-ed education (which existed in Bahrain). Divorced women have custody of the boys (not in Islam) “children must go back to their father after the age of seven years”. A deluge (male) had to present women in court and ministries (not in Bahrain, but in Religion). Women do run her own properties, money and take care of her own business (the first wife of the prophet Khadija was a merchant running her business).
Second let us see women’s social life in Bahrain. In 10 there were given the right to vote for candidates. They have the right to be representative in the “Shoura” council. Women in Bahrain have the right to do any work she could mange it. There is no work restriction with male. Now a day some women are ministers of specific ministries in the government. They are not eliminated in society. They have almost the same rights that man has.
Bahrain is the first countries to give women’s rights. Some behavior was not in Islam, because people are following the modernization. Women are quiet happy in Bahrain for having there rights. But they are still asking for more political freedom.
Please note that this sample paper on Women’s Freedom in Bahrain is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Women’s Freedom in Bahrain, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Women’s Freedom in Bahrain will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
Evolution vs Creationalism
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Evolution vs Creationalism. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Evolution vs Creationalism paper right on time.
Niles Eldredge believes in evolution, which states that all science is theory; he also believes that creationism should not be taught in a classroom environment. Many creationists disagree; over this heated debate that has been going on since the idea of evolution. “Although technological advances since 15 have been prodigious, and although science news magazines are springing up like toadstools, the American public appears to be badly informed about the real nature of science as it ever was” (p. 516). I agree with Niles Eldredge that evolution should be taught in the school system over creationism. “Much of the success of recent creationists efforts lies in a prior failure to educate our children about science � how it is done, by whom, and how its results are to be interpreted” (517).
Eldredge states that evolution is only a theory. “To the charge the ‘evolution is only a theory’, we say ‘all science is theory’. Theories are ideas or complex sets of ideas, which explain some aspect of the natural world” (p. 51). Eldredge shows the reader that, “All biologists, including biochemists, molecular geneticists, physiologists, behaviorists, and anatomists, see a pattern of similarity interlocking the spectrum of millions of species, from bacteria to timber wolves”(51). He continues to inform us that, “All forms of life have the nuclei acid RNA. One major branch of life, the vertebrates, all share backbones. All mammals have three inner ear bones, hair, and mammary glands” (51). It seems that evolution comes with some scientific proof, even though; it is still only a theory. Evolution is a process of change in a certain direction, a historical development of a biological group, and it is a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other pre-existing types, and that the distinguishable differences are due to modification in successive generations.
“Creationists, of course, have an alternative explanation for this order permeating life’s diversity. It is simply the way the supernatural creator chose to pattern life” (51). They continue to say “...evolution is only a theory. Scientists cannot agree on all details either of the exact course of evolutionary, history, of how evolution actually takes place’” (518). They continue on to say “Creationists then declare that many scientists have grave doubts that evolution actually [has] occurred … They argue that since evolution is only a theory, why not, in the spirit of fair play, give equal time to equally plausible explanation of the origin of the cosmos, of life on earth, and of mankind” (518). Creationists believe that God created everything, I feel that more people would believe their theory if they had physical evidence to prove their theory. “No form of creationism even remotely qualifies for inclusion in a science curriculum” (50). Some schools are letting teachers adopt the “equal time”. “Increasingly, teachers are left to their own discretion, and whether out of personal conviction, a desire to be ‘fair’, or fear of parental reprisal, they are teaching creationism along with evolution in their biology classes. It is simply the path of least resistance” (50). I feel that this theory; if taught at all in public schools should be taught to students in high school or older, so they can make their own opinion about which theory they believe and which one they do not believe.
“Biologists of all disciplines agree to a remarkable degree on the outlines of this theory, the so�called ‘modern synthesis’. In a nutshell, this was a vindication of Darwin’s original position that evolution is predominantly an affair of gradual progressive change. As environmental conditions changed, natural selection favored those variants best suited to new conditions. Thus evolutionary change is fundamentally adaptive” (51-). I feel that creationism should not be taught within the public school system. Evolution in the other hand; while not a finally theory, has more credibility then creationism and should be taught in the public school system. Creationism should be continued to be taught at Sunday schools, and in private schools, where religion is accepted by the attendee’s choice. “If the public were more aware that scientist are expected to disagree, that what a scientist writes today is not the last word, but a progress report on some very intensive thinking and investigation, creationists would be far less successful in injecting an authoritarian system of belief into curricula supposedly devoted to free, open rational inquiry into the nature of natural things” (p. 5).
Please note that this sample paper on Evolution vs Creationalism is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Evolution vs Creationalism, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Evolution vs Creationalism will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Evolution vs Creationalism, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Evolution vs Creationalism paper at affordable prices with !
Niles Eldredge believes in evolution, which states that all science is theory; he also believes that creationism should not be taught in a classroom environment. Many creationists disagree; over this heated debate that has been going on since the idea of evolution. “Although technological advances since 15 have been prodigious, and although science news magazines are springing up like toadstools, the American public appears to be badly informed about the real nature of science as it ever was” (p. 516). I agree with Niles Eldredge that evolution should be taught in the school system over creationism. “Much of the success of recent creationists efforts lies in a prior failure to educate our children about science � how it is done, by whom, and how its results are to be interpreted” (517).
Eldredge states that evolution is only a theory. “To the charge the ‘evolution is only a theory’, we say ‘all science is theory’. Theories are ideas or complex sets of ideas, which explain some aspect of the natural world” (p. 51). Eldredge shows the reader that, “All biologists, including biochemists, molecular geneticists, physiologists, behaviorists, and anatomists, see a pattern of similarity interlocking the spectrum of millions of species, from bacteria to timber wolves”(51). He continues to inform us that, “All forms of life have the nuclei acid RNA. One major branch of life, the vertebrates, all share backbones. All mammals have three inner ear bones, hair, and mammary glands” (51). It seems that evolution comes with some scientific proof, even though; it is still only a theory. Evolution is a process of change in a certain direction, a historical development of a biological group, and it is a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other pre-existing types, and that the distinguishable differences are due to modification in successive generations.
“Creationists, of course, have an alternative explanation for this order permeating life’s diversity. It is simply the way the supernatural creator chose to pattern life” (51). They continue to say “...evolution is only a theory. Scientists cannot agree on all details either of the exact course of evolutionary, history, of how evolution actually takes place’” (518). They continue on to say “Creationists then declare that many scientists have grave doubts that evolution actually [has] occurred … They argue that since evolution is only a theory, why not, in the spirit of fair play, give equal time to equally plausible explanation of the origin of the cosmos, of life on earth, and of mankind” (518). Creationists believe that God created everything, I feel that more people would believe their theory if they had physical evidence to prove their theory. “No form of creationism even remotely qualifies for inclusion in a science curriculum” (50). Some schools are letting teachers adopt the “equal time”. “Increasingly, teachers are left to their own discretion, and whether out of personal conviction, a desire to be ‘fair’, or fear of parental reprisal, they are teaching creationism along with evolution in their biology classes. It is simply the path of least resistance” (50). I feel that this theory; if taught at all in public schools should be taught to students in high school or older, so they can make their own opinion about which theory they believe and which one they do not believe.
“Biologists of all disciplines agree to a remarkable degree on the outlines of this theory, the so�called ‘modern synthesis’. In a nutshell, this was a vindication of Darwin’s original position that evolution is predominantly an affair of gradual progressive change. As environmental conditions changed, natural selection favored those variants best suited to new conditions. Thus evolutionary change is fundamentally adaptive” (51-). I feel that creationism should not be taught within the public school system. Evolution in the other hand; while not a finally theory, has more credibility then creationism and should be taught in the public school system. Creationism should be continued to be taught at Sunday schools, and in private schools, where religion is accepted by the attendee’s choice. “If the public were more aware that scientist are expected to disagree, that what a scientist writes today is not the last word, but a progress report on some very intensive thinking and investigation, creationists would be far less successful in injecting an authoritarian system of belief into curricula supposedly devoted to free, open rational inquiry into the nature of natural things” (p. 5).
Please note that this sample paper on Evolution vs Creationalism is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Evolution vs Creationalism, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Evolution vs Creationalism will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
California Recall
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on California Recall. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality California Recall paper right on time.
California Recall
A matter of conscience invites me to declare my perspectives as I cast my vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger as Governor of the State of California. As the rest of the world peers in and amuses themselves at the state of our State, I would like to present a perspective of a ninth generation Californian, a product of our public schools, and a graduate of our University system. In the recall election, my vote is cast based upon three essential arguments.
1.) The truth of the matter is, no matter whom California elects, no one will be able to solve our budget crisis. Over half of our state’s financial resources are allocated to the numerous propositions that are routinely passed by the voting public, and cannot be touched by the executive branch. Even Harry Houdini could not get us out of the financial and bureaucratic mess that we have created for ourselves. In order to balance the budget, we will need to drastically raise taxes, which the citizens of California will not allow to happen. This is a very important point in the context of national politics, as it is becoming very apparent that, in the near future, California will need a federal bailout. Many of our states are racing towards bankruptcy, with California as the case subject, and our national government is not anticipating their future bailouts. Already the national government, under this administration, has greatly reduced the funds allocated to relief of the States. While our national deficit soars, we are failing to anticipate these future expenditures.
.) As for political capabilities, as career politicians Bustamante and McClintock are more familiar with our budget and the nuances of our governmental structure. However, Arnold, as Governor, has many advantages. Although a Republican, he is very liberal, as is much of California (even our conservatives here are liberal conservatives). Arnold’s high profile will give this great state, the fifth largest economy in the world (or so the commercials tell me), the visibility and cultural gravity that it deserves. No one expects Arnold to become entrenched in partisan politics or embody the right wing of the Republican Party, but instead to stay, more or less, in the medium of the political spectrum. The fact that Maria Shriver is his wife, would lead me to believe that much of his personal political advise would be coming from democratic leaders, as well/in addition to Republican leadership, providing for a sound base.
.) To vote for Arnold as Governor is very Californian. While I am hesitant to embrace the capitalist and commercial culture that is growing ever more prevalent in our nation’s composition (I have neither refinanced nor bought a cell phone that emails pictures), I do believe local culture is special and essential. California is unique is so many ways, and the fact is, electing Arnold is very Californian. In some respect, leaders of localities should reflect the customs and cultures of their regions- just as I expect the Prime Minister of Great Britain to reflect in some capacity the British, the Chancellor of Germany to reflect in some capacity the Germans, and the Governor of say, Georgia or Montana, to reflect in some capacity the citizens of Georgia or Montana; Arnold is very Californian. Immigrant (so many of us here are), Hollywood, and a man who found fame and fortune in California- think Silicon Valley, the Gold Rush, and telecommunications.
Final Note- In respects to the notion that a No vote is prudent, and that the recall is too expensive and frivolous, that may be correct. However, it is my opinion that it is here now, and the time and money have already been spent. Whether we vote no or yes, the costs have occurred. Therefore, I do not have a problem with ousting a tremendously unpopular public servant. And as for my new choice, I would like to think I’m voting Californian!!!
Thank you very much,
Brian Bent
Coronado, CA
Please note that this sample paper on California Recall is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on California Recall, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on California Recall will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in California Recall, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your California Recall paper at affordable prices with !
California Recall
A matter of conscience invites me to declare my perspectives as I cast my vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger as Governor of the State of California. As the rest of the world peers in and amuses themselves at the state of our State, I would like to present a perspective of a ninth generation Californian, a product of our public schools, and a graduate of our University system. In the recall election, my vote is cast based upon three essential arguments.
1.) The truth of the matter is, no matter whom California elects, no one will be able to solve our budget crisis. Over half of our state’s financial resources are allocated to the numerous propositions that are routinely passed by the voting public, and cannot be touched by the executive branch. Even Harry Houdini could not get us out of the financial and bureaucratic mess that we have created for ourselves. In order to balance the budget, we will need to drastically raise taxes, which the citizens of California will not allow to happen. This is a very important point in the context of national politics, as it is becoming very apparent that, in the near future, California will need a federal bailout. Many of our states are racing towards bankruptcy, with California as the case subject, and our national government is not anticipating their future bailouts. Already the national government, under this administration, has greatly reduced the funds allocated to relief of the States. While our national deficit soars, we are failing to anticipate these future expenditures.
.) As for political capabilities, as career politicians Bustamante and McClintock are more familiar with our budget and the nuances of our governmental structure. However, Arnold, as Governor, has many advantages. Although a Republican, he is very liberal, as is much of California (even our conservatives here are liberal conservatives). Arnold’s high profile will give this great state, the fifth largest economy in the world (or so the commercials tell me), the visibility and cultural gravity that it deserves. No one expects Arnold to become entrenched in partisan politics or embody the right wing of the Republican Party, but instead to stay, more or less, in the medium of the political spectrum. The fact that Maria Shriver is his wife, would lead me to believe that much of his personal political advise would be coming from democratic leaders, as well/in addition to Republican leadership, providing for a sound base.
.) To vote for Arnold as Governor is very Californian. While I am hesitant to embrace the capitalist and commercial culture that is growing ever more prevalent in our nation’s composition (I have neither refinanced nor bought a cell phone that emails pictures), I do believe local culture is special and essential. California is unique is so many ways, and the fact is, electing Arnold is very Californian. In some respect, leaders of localities should reflect the customs and cultures of their regions- just as I expect the Prime Minister of Great Britain to reflect in some capacity the British, the Chancellor of Germany to reflect in some capacity the Germans, and the Governor of say, Georgia or Montana, to reflect in some capacity the citizens of Georgia or Montana; Arnold is very Californian. Immigrant (so many of us here are), Hollywood, and a man who found fame and fortune in California- think Silicon Valley, the Gold Rush, and telecommunications.
Final Note- In respects to the notion that a No vote is prudent, and that the recall is too expensive and frivolous, that may be correct. However, it is my opinion that it is here now, and the time and money have already been spent. Whether we vote no or yes, the costs have occurred. Therefore, I do not have a problem with ousting a tremendously unpopular public servant. And as for my new choice, I would like to think I’m voting Californian!!!
Thank you very much,
Brian Bent
Coronado, CA
Please note that this sample paper on California Recall is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on California Recall, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on California Recall will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
Consent to medical procedures and best interests of the child in Australia.(This essay won a University Prize)
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Consent to medical procedures and best interests of the child in Australia.(This essay won a University Prize). What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Consent to medical procedures and best interests of the child in Australia.(This essay won a University Prize) paper right on time.
“In the overwhelming majority of cases, the best judges of a child’s welfare are his or her parents.” Lord Fraser, Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [186] AC 11
This statement by Lord Fraser has been incorporated into Australian law since Marion’s case was decided in 1 and rest on the presumption that parents will always act in the child’s ‘best interests’ when making decisions for the child. However, is this the case in all situations? In critical matters, are parents granted the right to make decisions for their children? What are a child’s ‘best interests’? What degree of autonomy do children have in the context of health care choices? What considerations are deemed to be relevant in a contest between the parties? This discussion paper explores these issues as well as examining what is likely to happen if a dispute comes before the Family Court under the current law in South Australia.
Who is a child?
The stipulation of what age separates childhood from adult hood is purely arbitrary. In both domestic and international law , children are those persons who have not yet achieved the age of 18 years. The Family Law Act 175 declares that a child is a person under the age of 18 years. All other persons are deemed to be adults.
In South Australia, in the medico-legal context, a person of 16 years of age may exercise the ‘adult’ right of granting their consent to medical treatment by virtue of s 6 of the Consent to Treatment and Palliative Care Act 15.
Why are parents responsible for children’s welfare?
Children live under the aegis of their adult guardians who derive their parental powers to make decisions on behalf of the child from both the common law and legislation. The explanation for the old common law powers of parental control is the oft-quoted statement by Blackstone that “…the power of parents is derived from their duty…”. However, any absolute right of control or right arising from a duty has been rejected as part of the Australian common law. Instead, the contemporary view is that the “… common law gives this power to parents simply because it perceives them to be the most appropriate repository of such a power.”
Parental responsibility is defined in s 61B of the Family Law Act 175 as meaning all the duties, powers, responsibilities and authority which, by law, parents have in relation to their children. This definition does not explain what these duties, et cetera are; therefore, it must be presumed that the reference is to common law and legislative rights and responsibilities.
Why do courts have a responsibility for children’s welfare?
Courts are charged with responsibility for children under the doctrine of parens patriae, literally “parent of the nation”. The role of the courts is to act as an objective parent. The objective test is set in the context of the ordinary mother and father [more passengers bound for Clapham!] and applied subjectively to the particular child. Indeed, the Family Court has greater powers than parents do in deciding matters relating to a child’s best interests with respect to a child of a marriage. It can also override any decision by the State courts vis à vis the welfare of a child who is not a ward of the state.
What are the ‘best interests’ of the child and how are they defined?
Although much talked about, a child’s ‘best interests’ are in reality an abstract concept. They are not defined in any statute or case law, yet they are the presumptive standard used by parents and judicial officers when making decisions regarding children. The Family Law Act 175 states that a child’s best interests are paramount when making decisions with respect to the child’s ‘care, welfare and development’. The Family Court’s powers over parents in this area will be discussed later.
The sanctity of life is a presumption that appears throughout judgements concerning children particularly when parents have decided to withhold their consent for medical treatment in circumstances that might lead to the death of the child. Another presumption is framed in the context of what quality of life outcomes are associated with a particular medical treatment and whether it would have a detrimental effect on the child’s development into adulthood.
In deciding what constitutes best interests however, it seems that the emotional trauma associated with some procedures is not taken into account. Treatments that produce emotional trauma will be justified because the trauma will be outweighed by the anticipated benefits of the procedure. In fact, the predicted physical outcome of a particular course of treatment seems to be the main determinant factor in judicial decisions. This leads us to another apparent presumption made by the courts; that is, the supremacy of medical opinion over all other considerations.
The rule of law v the rule of medicine.
Medical opinion has a considerable impact on the courts determination of what constitutes acting in the child’s best interests. Without exception this will be the most decisive factor where the sanctity of life is in issue, even in cases where a ‘Gillick competent’ child has unequivocally refused consent to the procedure . In every reported case the medical profession was granted consent by the court to proceed with treatment they deemed most appropriate, despite the refusal by the child and, in some instances, contrary to the wishes of the parents. The courts have even acquiesced to medical opinion in cases where the religious or cultural wishes of the child or the parents have been contrary to medical opinion. In the case of Re Hofbauer the New York Court of Appeal allowed parents to adopt an ‘alternative’ form of treatment for their child.
Although it is thought unlikely that such a course would be taken by English or Australian courts, it would appear that they have ceded significant discretionary powers to the medical profession in a manner that is inconsistent with the Australian common law principle developed in Rogers v Whitaker . The recourse by the court to the Bolam principle, of allowing medical opinion to be the paramount consideration, is inconsistent with the High Court decision, which reposes all discretionary power in the court. In turn, his rise in the status of medical opinions to the level of matters of judicial notice overwhelms the role of the parent. The advisory role of the medical profession should not be allowed to become one of absolute authority.
Do children in South Australia attain medico-legal adult rights at 16 years?
As noted above, persons in South Australia who have attained the age of 16 years are granted the power to consent to medical treatment by virtue of s 6 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 15. However, this grant does not create an unfettered right to make decisions with respect to all medical treatment. Although children may be able to consent to medical procedures, they do not apparently possess the corollary right of refusal.
Furthermore, the Family Court could hold the right granted to the child under the State Act as invalid. In a contested situation where the child was maintaining this right to consent to medical treatment the Family Court could overrule the child’s ability, and indeed the parents ability, to exercise any power of consent because of its supreme jurisdiction over matters concerning the welfare of children in Australia. This is a point to which I shall return.
When can children have the unequivocal right to consent or refuse?
Quite obviously, in the case of infants and ‘young’ children, it is neither logical nor practicable to allow them to make decisions on a matter that may have profound and irreversible ramifications on their future. However, there could come a time, before attaining majority, when a person is capable of not only consenting to medical treatment but also refusing to be subjected to it. Currently this is does not seem to be the case in England or in Australia.
“Every human being of adult years and of sound mind has the right to determine what shall be done to [their] own body…” even if death is the consequence of that decision. The underlying principle, the ‘presumptive standard’, is that all adults are presumed to be competent to make decisions of that magnitude. However, children are presumed to be incompetent unless they can demonstrate that they have achieved “… a sufficient understanding and intelligence to enable [them] to understand fully what is proposed.”. This level of understanding, known as ‘Gillick competence’, must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the court, and has become known as the ‘evidential standard’ of competence as opposed to the presumptive standard outlined above.
Clearly the evidential standard is harder to achieve than the presumptive standard. The presumptive standard always exists until rebutted, usually by expert opinion evidence. The evidential standard however must be proven to exist to the degree required by civil law; that is, on the balance of probabilities. One of the problems that has been encountered by children with respect to establishing this standard has been that if their preference does not accord with the prevailing medical opinion, then their decision will be seen as irrational and therefore falling short of the evidential standard.
Therefore, the unequivocal autonomous right of a child to determine appropriate medical treatment can only be achieved by compliance with the prevailing medical and legal opinions. Compliance is inconsistent with the notion of autonomy.
Autonomy for children
Autonomy is recognised as a ‘general moral notion’ that empowers individuals to make their own decisions based on “… their own values and beliefs without the interference of another individuals values.”. It has been suggested that it is in the best interests of both the individual and society that autonomous decisions be respected, provided that significant harm to others does not result from that course of action.
The preamble to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by Australia in 11, recognises that children have a right of autonomy that develops in accordance with their capacity. Article 1 of the Convention states that “State parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.” This article also implicitly confers on the child the right to be heard in judicial proceedings. However, in matters before the Family Court, where most decisions affecting a child’s welfare with respect to medico-legal issues will be made, children are represented by court appointed ‘separate representatives’
The findings of the Australian Law Reform Commission were that in most cases the representatives “… discount, editorialise or reject …” the child’s expressed wishes and “… argue the case in accordance with [the separate representatives] own views of the child’s best interests.” This practice, in the case of a ‘Gillick competent’ child, does not accord with either the notion of autonomy or the obligation that Australia has by virtue of its ratification of the treaty emanating from the Convention. Moreover, the actions of the separate representatives could be the subject of a challenge under the external affairs powers of the Constitution.
The ratification of a treaty does not introduce its terms into the law of Australia. However, it may have an impact on the interpretation of legislation and the development of the common law. Furthermore, in the case of Teoh v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs it was held by the Full Bench of the Federal Court that an obligation under a treaty would be a relevant consideration for a public officer who is entrusted with a discretion, or it may form the foundation for a legitimate expectation that the officer will exercise a discretion in a particular way.
It is arguable that the separate representative, as an appointed officer of the court, is a public officer within the meaning of Teoh’s case and therefore bound by that decision to conform with the provisions of Article 1 of the Convention, particularly if the separate representatives are employees of the Legal Services Commission.
In South Australia, can a 16 year old person exercise an unfettered right to consent to medical treatment?
Under South Australian legislation, a person of 16 years can give consent to medical treatment in the same way as an adult. However, this grant of right to the person is probably invalid under the provisions of s 10 of the Constitution because of an inconsistency with Part VII of the Family Law Act 175. A Commonwealth law may exclude the operation of a State law, or render the law inoperative, where there is an inconsistency between them.
An indirect inconsistency between State and Commonwealth law can arise in circumstances where it can be inferred that the intention of the Commonwealth law was to ‘cover the field’. There are three questions to consider when determining whether there is an indirect inconsistency between two laws. The questions to be answered are; what field or subject does the Commonwealth law seek to regulate; is the Commonwealth law intended to be the law; does the State law encroach upon that area of Commonwealth responsibility?
In the case of P v P a majority of the High Court held that PartVII of the Act was intended to confer on the Family Court, jurisdiction - unimpeded by State laws - to authorise the sterilisation of a child. It was determined that the jurisdiction of the Family Court was directly concerned with child welfare issues and therefore supported by s 51 (xxi) and s 51 (xxii) of the Constitution. Welfare rights were deemed to be an aspect of the jurisdiction of the Family Court, which could be frustrated if State laws were allowed to circumscribe the Courts’ powers in determining the circumstances in which a child could be subjected to medical treatment.
From the decision in P v P it is arguable that the High Court decided that the subject matter which Part VII of the Family Law 175 was intended to regulate ‘covers’ all welfare matters affecting children with respect to medical treatment. As any person who has not attained the age of 18 is a child under Family Law, this would also include children in South Australia who are purported to have been enfranchised with the right to consent to medical treatment.
Another way to determine whether the Commonwealth intended the Family Law Act 175 to be the law on this subject matter is to demonstrate that there is a manifest intention of exclusivity on the part of the Commonwealth. In O’Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd it was decided that if the Commonwealth legislation could be described as an “… extremely elaborate and detailed…” piece of legislation then this characteristic decisively demonstrated the intention on the part of the Commonwealth to ‘cover the field’. It could be contended that the extensive and elaborate details of Part VII of the Family Law Act 175 dealing with child welfare evinces an intention by the Commonwealth to exhaustively cover this field of subject matter.
An attempt by the State to make a law regulating some aspect of child welfare would be inconsistent with the Family Law Act 175 and would arguably render it invalid under the provisions of s 10 of the Constitution. Therefore, the grant of right under Section 6 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 15 is probably invalid. It could also be invalid because it purports to create a legal right that the Commonwealth law effectively prohibits.
How true is the statement of Lord Fraser?
In the overwhelming majority of case where there is no matter in dispute, parents are probably deemed to be the best judges of a child’s welfare. However, in matters critical to the health of a child where the parents consider issues other than bald medical outcomes to be important, the opinion of the medical profession rather than the judgement of the parents will rule supreme in a manner that is arguably inconsistent with Australian law. Therefore parental autonomy is conditional to medical opinion.
In the area of autonomy children fare no better than their parents do. In South Australia, a person of 16 years or a ‘Gillick’ competent child can allegedly consent to medical treatment. However, any right to consent they may have is circumscribed by the provisions of Part VII of the Family Law Act and the fact that s 6 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act is probably invalid under s 10 of the Constitution.
Please note that this sample paper on Consent to medical procedures and best interests of the child in Australia.(This essay won a University Prize) is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Consent to medical procedures and best interests of the child in Australia.(This essay won a University Prize), we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Consent to medical procedures and best interests of the child in Australia.(This essay won a University Prize) will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Consent to medical procedures and best interests of the child in Australia.(This essay won a University Prize), therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Consent to medical procedures and best interests of the child in Australia.(This essay won a University Prize) paper at affordable prices with !
“In the overwhelming majority of cases, the best judges of a child’s welfare are his or her parents.” Lord Fraser, Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [186] AC 11
This statement by Lord Fraser has been incorporated into Australian law since Marion’s case was decided in 1 and rest on the presumption that parents will always act in the child’s ‘best interests’ when making decisions for the child. However, is this the case in all situations? In critical matters, are parents granted the right to make decisions for their children? What are a child’s ‘best interests’? What degree of autonomy do children have in the context of health care choices? What considerations are deemed to be relevant in a contest between the parties? This discussion paper explores these issues as well as examining what is likely to happen if a dispute comes before the Family Court under the current law in South Australia.
Who is a child?
The stipulation of what age separates childhood from adult hood is purely arbitrary. In both domestic and international law , children are those persons who have not yet achieved the age of 18 years. The Family Law Act 175 declares that a child is a person under the age of 18 years. All other persons are deemed to be adults.
In South Australia, in the medico-legal context, a person of 16 years of age may exercise the ‘adult’ right of granting their consent to medical treatment by virtue of s 6 of the Consent to Treatment and Palliative Care Act 15.
Why are parents responsible for children’s welfare?
Children live under the aegis of their adult guardians who derive their parental powers to make decisions on behalf of the child from both the common law and legislation. The explanation for the old common law powers of parental control is the oft-quoted statement by Blackstone that “…the power of parents is derived from their duty…”. However, any absolute right of control or right arising from a duty has been rejected as part of the Australian common law. Instead, the contemporary view is that the “… common law gives this power to parents simply because it perceives them to be the most appropriate repository of such a power.”
Parental responsibility is defined in s 61B of the Family Law Act 175 as meaning all the duties, powers, responsibilities and authority which, by law, parents have in relation to their children. This definition does not explain what these duties, et cetera are; therefore, it must be presumed that the reference is to common law and legislative rights and responsibilities.
Why do courts have a responsibility for children’s welfare?
Courts are charged with responsibility for children under the doctrine of parens patriae, literally “parent of the nation”. The role of the courts is to act as an objective parent. The objective test is set in the context of the ordinary mother and father [more passengers bound for Clapham!] and applied subjectively to the particular child. Indeed, the Family Court has greater powers than parents do in deciding matters relating to a child’s best interests with respect to a child of a marriage. It can also override any decision by the State courts vis à vis the welfare of a child who is not a ward of the state.
What are the ‘best interests’ of the child and how are they defined?
Although much talked about, a child’s ‘best interests’ are in reality an abstract concept. They are not defined in any statute or case law, yet they are the presumptive standard used by parents and judicial officers when making decisions regarding children. The Family Law Act 175 states that a child’s best interests are paramount when making decisions with respect to the child’s ‘care, welfare and development’. The Family Court’s powers over parents in this area will be discussed later.
The sanctity of life is a presumption that appears throughout judgements concerning children particularly when parents have decided to withhold their consent for medical treatment in circumstances that might lead to the death of the child. Another presumption is framed in the context of what quality of life outcomes are associated with a particular medical treatment and whether it would have a detrimental effect on the child’s development into adulthood.
In deciding what constitutes best interests however, it seems that the emotional trauma associated with some procedures is not taken into account. Treatments that produce emotional trauma will be justified because the trauma will be outweighed by the anticipated benefits of the procedure. In fact, the predicted physical outcome of a particular course of treatment seems to be the main determinant factor in judicial decisions. This leads us to another apparent presumption made by the courts; that is, the supremacy of medical opinion over all other considerations.
The rule of law v the rule of medicine.
Medical opinion has a considerable impact on the courts determination of what constitutes acting in the child’s best interests. Without exception this will be the most decisive factor where the sanctity of life is in issue, even in cases where a ‘Gillick competent’ child has unequivocally refused consent to the procedure . In every reported case the medical profession was granted consent by the court to proceed with treatment they deemed most appropriate, despite the refusal by the child and, in some instances, contrary to the wishes of the parents. The courts have even acquiesced to medical opinion in cases where the religious or cultural wishes of the child or the parents have been contrary to medical opinion. In the case of Re Hofbauer the New York Court of Appeal allowed parents to adopt an ‘alternative’ form of treatment for their child.
Although it is thought unlikely that such a course would be taken by English or Australian courts, it would appear that they have ceded significant discretionary powers to the medical profession in a manner that is inconsistent with the Australian common law principle developed in Rogers v Whitaker . The recourse by the court to the Bolam principle, of allowing medical opinion to be the paramount consideration, is inconsistent with the High Court decision, which reposes all discretionary power in the court. In turn, his rise in the status of medical opinions to the level of matters of judicial notice overwhelms the role of the parent. The advisory role of the medical profession should not be allowed to become one of absolute authority.
Do children in South Australia attain medico-legal adult rights at 16 years?
As noted above, persons in South Australia who have attained the age of 16 years are granted the power to consent to medical treatment by virtue of s 6 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 15. However, this grant does not create an unfettered right to make decisions with respect to all medical treatment. Although children may be able to consent to medical procedures, they do not apparently possess the corollary right of refusal.
Furthermore, the Family Court could hold the right granted to the child under the State Act as invalid. In a contested situation where the child was maintaining this right to consent to medical treatment the Family Court could overrule the child’s ability, and indeed the parents ability, to exercise any power of consent because of its supreme jurisdiction over matters concerning the welfare of children in Australia. This is a point to which I shall return.
When can children have the unequivocal right to consent or refuse?
Quite obviously, in the case of infants and ‘young’ children, it is neither logical nor practicable to allow them to make decisions on a matter that may have profound and irreversible ramifications on their future. However, there could come a time, before attaining majority, when a person is capable of not only consenting to medical treatment but also refusing to be subjected to it. Currently this is does not seem to be the case in England or in Australia.
“Every human being of adult years and of sound mind has the right to determine what shall be done to [their] own body…” even if death is the consequence of that decision. The underlying principle, the ‘presumptive standard’, is that all adults are presumed to be competent to make decisions of that magnitude. However, children are presumed to be incompetent unless they can demonstrate that they have achieved “… a sufficient understanding and intelligence to enable [them] to understand fully what is proposed.”. This level of understanding, known as ‘Gillick competence’, must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the court, and has become known as the ‘evidential standard’ of competence as opposed to the presumptive standard outlined above.
Clearly the evidential standard is harder to achieve than the presumptive standard. The presumptive standard always exists until rebutted, usually by expert opinion evidence. The evidential standard however must be proven to exist to the degree required by civil law; that is, on the balance of probabilities. One of the problems that has been encountered by children with respect to establishing this standard has been that if their preference does not accord with the prevailing medical opinion, then their decision will be seen as irrational and therefore falling short of the evidential standard.
Therefore, the unequivocal autonomous right of a child to determine appropriate medical treatment can only be achieved by compliance with the prevailing medical and legal opinions. Compliance is inconsistent with the notion of autonomy.
Autonomy for children
Autonomy is recognised as a ‘general moral notion’ that empowers individuals to make their own decisions based on “… their own values and beliefs without the interference of another individuals values.”. It has been suggested that it is in the best interests of both the individual and society that autonomous decisions be respected, provided that significant harm to others does not result from that course of action.
The preamble to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by Australia in 11, recognises that children have a right of autonomy that develops in accordance with their capacity. Article 1 of the Convention states that “State parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.” This article also implicitly confers on the child the right to be heard in judicial proceedings. However, in matters before the Family Court, where most decisions affecting a child’s welfare with respect to medico-legal issues will be made, children are represented by court appointed ‘separate representatives’
The findings of the Australian Law Reform Commission were that in most cases the representatives “… discount, editorialise or reject …” the child’s expressed wishes and “… argue the case in accordance with [the separate representatives] own views of the child’s best interests.” This practice, in the case of a ‘Gillick competent’ child, does not accord with either the notion of autonomy or the obligation that Australia has by virtue of its ratification of the treaty emanating from the Convention. Moreover, the actions of the separate representatives could be the subject of a challenge under the external affairs powers of the Constitution.
The ratification of a treaty does not introduce its terms into the law of Australia. However, it may have an impact on the interpretation of legislation and the development of the common law. Furthermore, in the case of Teoh v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs it was held by the Full Bench of the Federal Court that an obligation under a treaty would be a relevant consideration for a public officer who is entrusted with a discretion, or it may form the foundation for a legitimate expectation that the officer will exercise a discretion in a particular way.
It is arguable that the separate representative, as an appointed officer of the court, is a public officer within the meaning of Teoh’s case and therefore bound by that decision to conform with the provisions of Article 1 of the Convention, particularly if the separate representatives are employees of the Legal Services Commission.
In South Australia, can a 16 year old person exercise an unfettered right to consent to medical treatment?
Under South Australian legislation, a person of 16 years can give consent to medical treatment in the same way as an adult. However, this grant of right to the person is probably invalid under the provisions of s 10 of the Constitution because of an inconsistency with Part VII of the Family Law Act 175. A Commonwealth law may exclude the operation of a State law, or render the law inoperative, where there is an inconsistency between them.
An indirect inconsistency between State and Commonwealth law can arise in circumstances where it can be inferred that the intention of the Commonwealth law was to ‘cover the field’. There are three questions to consider when determining whether there is an indirect inconsistency between two laws. The questions to be answered are; what field or subject does the Commonwealth law seek to regulate; is the Commonwealth law intended to be the law; does the State law encroach upon that area of Commonwealth responsibility?
In the case of P v P a majority of the High Court held that PartVII of the Act was intended to confer on the Family Court, jurisdiction - unimpeded by State laws - to authorise the sterilisation of a child. It was determined that the jurisdiction of the Family Court was directly concerned with child welfare issues and therefore supported by s 51 (xxi) and s 51 (xxii) of the Constitution. Welfare rights were deemed to be an aspect of the jurisdiction of the Family Court, which could be frustrated if State laws were allowed to circumscribe the Courts’ powers in determining the circumstances in which a child could be subjected to medical treatment.
From the decision in P v P it is arguable that the High Court decided that the subject matter which Part VII of the Family Law 175 was intended to regulate ‘covers’ all welfare matters affecting children with respect to medical treatment. As any person who has not attained the age of 18 is a child under Family Law, this would also include children in South Australia who are purported to have been enfranchised with the right to consent to medical treatment.
Another way to determine whether the Commonwealth intended the Family Law Act 175 to be the law on this subject matter is to demonstrate that there is a manifest intention of exclusivity on the part of the Commonwealth. In O’Sullivan v Noarlunga Meat Ltd it was decided that if the Commonwealth legislation could be described as an “… extremely elaborate and detailed…” piece of legislation then this characteristic decisively demonstrated the intention on the part of the Commonwealth to ‘cover the field’. It could be contended that the extensive and elaborate details of Part VII of the Family Law Act 175 dealing with child welfare evinces an intention by the Commonwealth to exhaustively cover this field of subject matter.
An attempt by the State to make a law regulating some aspect of child welfare would be inconsistent with the Family Law Act 175 and would arguably render it invalid under the provisions of s 10 of the Constitution. Therefore, the grant of right under Section 6 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 15 is probably invalid. It could also be invalid because it purports to create a legal right that the Commonwealth law effectively prohibits.
How true is the statement of Lord Fraser?
In the overwhelming majority of case where there is no matter in dispute, parents are probably deemed to be the best judges of a child’s welfare. However, in matters critical to the health of a child where the parents consider issues other than bald medical outcomes to be important, the opinion of the medical profession rather than the judgement of the parents will rule supreme in a manner that is arguably inconsistent with Australian law. Therefore parental autonomy is conditional to medical opinion.
In the area of autonomy children fare no better than their parents do. In South Australia, a person of 16 years or a ‘Gillick’ competent child can allegedly consent to medical treatment. However, any right to consent they may have is circumscribed by the provisions of Part VII of the Family Law Act and the fact that s 6 of the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act is probably invalid under s 10 of the Constitution.
Please note that this sample paper on Consent to medical procedures and best interests of the child in Australia.(This essay won a University Prize) is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Consent to medical procedures and best interests of the child in Australia.(This essay won a University Prize), we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Consent to medical procedures and best interests of the child in Australia.(This essay won a University Prize) will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
Argumentative paper on Socrates Death
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Argumentative paper on Socrates Death. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Argumentative paper on Socrates Death paper right on time.
It seems to be a constant discussion in the writings of Plato that Socrates does not fear death. As Socrates is pondering death to his peers after being condemned he says, “What would not a man give if he might converse with Orpheus and Musaeus and Hesiod and Homer? Nay, if this be true, let me die and die again” (5). He does not have any fear at all concerning death. However, could he be pleased about his execution? To me it seems that the reason that Socrates has no fear of death is because he is trying to die unjustly, thus insuring that his name will live on.
In the Crito dialogue, some of Socrates’ friends are attempting to free him from prison. They are trying to bribe the guards to turn their heads until they sneak him out of his cell. However, Socrates will not escape. Crito says, “The public will never believe that we were anxious to save you but you wouldn’t escape” (0). Socrates mentions that it would be an injustice if he were to try to escape, even though he believes that he has been sentenced to death unfairly. He simply sits in his cell and awaits his death. Socrates is looking for martyrdom through his own wrongful death.
Socrates, being a man of exceptional wisdom, understands what happens to men who are killed unjustly - especially when it is a man in a leadership position. They are raised to the level of a martyr. Immediately following his sentencing, Socrates says, “ Not much time will be gained, O’ Athenians, in return for the evil name which you will get from the detractors of the city, who will say that you killed Socrates, a wise man; for they will call me wise, even though I am not wise, when they want to reproach you” (). Socrates realizes that he is held in a very high regard by some of the more prestigious members of Athens. He also knows that by dying an unjust death, his name will be remembered for all times. Socrates states, “And I prophesy to you who are my murderers, that immediately after my departure punishment far heavier than you have inflicted on me will surely await you” (). Only by insisting on his own death could he insure his own immortality.
One could say that Socrates really wasn’t seeking death, but just playing in his Socratic tone of sarcasm. After all, he does end up attempting to buy his freedom from his accusers with 0 minae. Knowing that Socrates and his friends could come up with a possible amount of money to save him, it is conceivable that he was trying to save himself. Socrates definitely has his own way of dealing with everyday problems that differs from the majority of us. Maybe he was simply toying with everyone around him. However, if he was really trying to save himself, why didn’t he suggest to pay a fine in the first place? After being convicted wrongly and awaiting sentencing, Socrates suggests that his punishment should be served in the Prytaneum. He means that he should be served lunch for free for the rest of his life. Of course Socrates’ sarcasm pours through these words like a waterfall, but, when faced with death, defining your own punishment should be something that would not upset the people who have the control over your life. Socrates is not even trying to save himself. He is merely making a mockery of the system. He is not fighting in anyway to prolong his death.
Another argument could be that Socrates himself does not really know if death is a good thing or a bad thing. Although he has no fear of death, he has very little true knowledge of it either. Socrates states, “I will not say of myself that I deserve any evil, or propose any penalty. Why should I? Because I am afraid of the penalty of death which Meletus proposes? When I do not know whether death is a good or an evil” (). Socrates is wise enough to question death. The fact that Socrates is open to the idea of not knowing whether death is a good or bad thing could point to the awareness of his own humanity. In being human, Socrates would not wish an evil upon himself. He knows that the penalty could be something horrific.
As an opposition to this, no one has true knowledge of death. Not even Socrates. In time Socrates would die anyway, but dying of old age would be an honest death - not one that would help to make his name live on. It would be better to die unjustly and leave a legacy than it would be to die and leave a small following that might drizzle out in a short time.
The fact that Socrates’ name still lives on to this day may be all of the proof needed to say that he did what he had to do to insure his own death. He had the chance to escape, but he declined. He held his constant Socratic sarcasm throughout the trial, and he prophesized being a martyr at the trial to his accusers. He just seemed too calm and relaxed for a man looking death in the face. It is one thing to not fear death, but it is all together another to embrace it. Had Socrates argued a little harder in his own defense the ending may have ended up much different, but is that what Socrates would have wanted?
REFERENCES
Plato (186), The Dialogues of Plato. New York, NY Bantam Books
Please note that this sample paper on Argumentative paper on Socrates Death is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Argumentative paper on Socrates Death, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Argumentative paper on Socrates Death will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Argumentative paper on Socrates Death, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Argumentative paper on Socrates Death paper at affordable prices with !
It seems to be a constant discussion in the writings of Plato that Socrates does not fear death. As Socrates is pondering death to his peers after being condemned he says, “What would not a man give if he might converse with Orpheus and Musaeus and Hesiod and Homer? Nay, if this be true, let me die and die again” (5). He does not have any fear at all concerning death. However, could he be pleased about his execution? To me it seems that the reason that Socrates has no fear of death is because he is trying to die unjustly, thus insuring that his name will live on.
In the Crito dialogue, some of Socrates’ friends are attempting to free him from prison. They are trying to bribe the guards to turn their heads until they sneak him out of his cell. However, Socrates will not escape. Crito says, “The public will never believe that we were anxious to save you but you wouldn’t escape” (0). Socrates mentions that it would be an injustice if he were to try to escape, even though he believes that he has been sentenced to death unfairly. He simply sits in his cell and awaits his death. Socrates is looking for martyrdom through his own wrongful death.
Socrates, being a man of exceptional wisdom, understands what happens to men who are killed unjustly - especially when it is a man in a leadership position. They are raised to the level of a martyr. Immediately following his sentencing, Socrates says, “ Not much time will be gained, O’ Athenians, in return for the evil name which you will get from the detractors of the city, who will say that you killed Socrates, a wise man; for they will call me wise, even though I am not wise, when they want to reproach you” (). Socrates realizes that he is held in a very high regard by some of the more prestigious members of Athens. He also knows that by dying an unjust death, his name will be remembered for all times. Socrates states, “And I prophesy to you who are my murderers, that immediately after my departure punishment far heavier than you have inflicted on me will surely await you” (). Only by insisting on his own death could he insure his own immortality.
One could say that Socrates really wasn’t seeking death, but just playing in his Socratic tone of sarcasm. After all, he does end up attempting to buy his freedom from his accusers with 0 minae. Knowing that Socrates and his friends could come up with a possible amount of money to save him, it is conceivable that he was trying to save himself. Socrates definitely has his own way of dealing with everyday problems that differs from the majority of us. Maybe he was simply toying with everyone around him. However, if he was really trying to save himself, why didn’t he suggest to pay a fine in the first place? After being convicted wrongly and awaiting sentencing, Socrates suggests that his punishment should be served in the Prytaneum. He means that he should be served lunch for free for the rest of his life. Of course Socrates’ sarcasm pours through these words like a waterfall, but, when faced with death, defining your own punishment should be something that would not upset the people who have the control over your life. Socrates is not even trying to save himself. He is merely making a mockery of the system. He is not fighting in anyway to prolong his death.
Another argument could be that Socrates himself does not really know if death is a good thing or a bad thing. Although he has no fear of death, he has very little true knowledge of it either. Socrates states, “I will not say of myself that I deserve any evil, or propose any penalty. Why should I? Because I am afraid of the penalty of death which Meletus proposes? When I do not know whether death is a good or an evil” (). Socrates is wise enough to question death. The fact that Socrates is open to the idea of not knowing whether death is a good or bad thing could point to the awareness of his own humanity. In being human, Socrates would not wish an evil upon himself. He knows that the penalty could be something horrific.
As an opposition to this, no one has true knowledge of death. Not even Socrates. In time Socrates would die anyway, but dying of old age would be an honest death - not one that would help to make his name live on. It would be better to die unjustly and leave a legacy than it would be to die and leave a small following that might drizzle out in a short time.
The fact that Socrates’ name still lives on to this day may be all of the proof needed to say that he did what he had to do to insure his own death. He had the chance to escape, but he declined. He held his constant Socratic sarcasm throughout the trial, and he prophesized being a martyr at the trial to his accusers. He just seemed too calm and relaxed for a man looking death in the face. It is one thing to not fear death, but it is all together another to embrace it. Had Socrates argued a little harder in his own defense the ending may have ended up much different, but is that what Socrates would have wanted?
REFERENCES
Plato (186), The Dialogues of Plato. New York, NY Bantam Books
Please note that this sample paper on Argumentative paper on Socrates Death is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Argumentative paper on Socrates Death, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Argumentative paper on Socrates Death will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
Junk Food
If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Junk Food. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Junk Food paper right on time.
Junk Food Killing Ourselves with Generosity
Feeling hungry? How about pizza, burgers, French fries and cola, or chicken patties, deep-fried? Are you thirsty? Then how about a milk shake or soda? Perhaps you want something sweet? Candy bars and crisps should do the trick. The truth is we love fast food. We love it even more if its deep fried in fat, full of salt, stacked with sugar and countless numbers not to mention flavored pulp.
There are over 00,000 fast food outlets in the US alone. Fast food, junk food, call it what you like, but its taking over our world. Junk food is fast, convenient, sadly predictable and everywhere. Our nutrition comes in a box, our thirst is quenched in a carton. No matter where we are in the world it seems junk food is there to comfort us. We think we know what were getting and we like it very much.
The only trouble is, junk food just does not feel the same way about us. Nutrition experts tell us that fast food is often high in calories, sodium, fat and cholesterol. Who cares? It tastes good and it smells good. How bad can that be? After all, its all around us, frozen in the supermarket and stacked in vending machines. We see the proof of our addictions, flashed across our TV screens hourly. The key words are Quick and Tasty and wherever we are, its never very far away.
National conglomerates spend millions endorsing games and toys with their drinks and burgers. Surely they wouldnt try and sell us food that is bad for us? These same companies give even more millions to our schools and colleges. Theyre funding our lifestyles and education. All the schools and colleges have to do is ensure we have easy access to that vending machine at all times of the day. All we have to do is to buy and eat and drink the cheap colourful products stacked up inside. Everyday and all day that is exactly what we do.
How wonderful this is on the cusp of the twenty first century. After all our time is in such short supply. We dont have time to cook. Were busy people, freed from the labour of the kitchen. Ping! That microwave meal is ready. The re-cycled packaging is already in the trash. The TV dinner soon consumed, we slump on the couch our only exercise being to switch the remote control.
How many of us realize that our diet and the way we eat and promote fast food is doing us serious damage? The US Department of Health and Human Services estimates that half a million deaths annually are due to cancer, heart disease, strokes and diabetes. They say that these deaths are directly linked to what we are eating. The fact is junk food kills as many Americans as tobacco.
It doesnt seem to matter to us that both tooth decay and obesity are on the rise in teens and adults. According to the Center for disease Control and Prevention more than half of all adults are now overweight or obese. Obesity rates in children and teens have doubled in size since the late 170s. Their problems with heart disease are all in the future. The funny clown wont be around by then. Hell be close to death, his arteries clogged up. His cardiovascular disease will be about to finish him off. This will be as a result of a process that will have started when he was five or six, a process that once begun, is irreversible. His bones will be brittle and weak. His teeth will have fallen out. Still, maybe hell still be able to polish off a milk shake flavored with a spoonful of pulp.
One average burger meal contains, hidden amongst the beef and cereals, additives and flavorings, ten teaspoons of salt. Ten! Trying eating that on its own and see how you feel. Theres enough sugar in a soda, along with the fruit pulp, to fill up your hands. How about that for healthy food? Now pile on the spoonfuls of fat that make up burgers and candy alike. Would you want to feed that to a child? Would you even eat it yourself?
We know that smoking is bad for us, though it was not always thought so. We know that drinking alcohol causes major damage and impairment to our bodies. We dont offer young children and teens these lethal toxic substances. Surely we should at least try and stop them filling up their bodies with unnecessary and harmful food and drink.
Kids love fast food. We treat them to it. Its all around them. Its not bad in moderation or as part of a balanced diet, say the experts. The truth is most of us have no idea what a balanced diet is. Kids love fast food because its all they see. They are being manipulated with advertising and so are we. Researchers at the University of Toronto have discovered that fat rich diets are not only bad for your heart, liver and teeth; they may also impair essential brain functions like concentration and memory. The quick fix buzz we get from eating sugar-drenched candy, is exactly that, a quick fix. Soon after we slump and become lethargic.
We all want to do right by our children and ourselves. Parents find it a continual struggle to encourage healthy eating habits. They are up against fierce competition in this hectic day and age. Pretty soon there will be a generation of parents who will never know what life was like before the advent of burger chains and fast food outlets. Ill health and obesity will be normal. High blood pressure and coronary disease will be rife.
It does not have to be so! Education is the key. We should make it our business to find out what we are eating and what we should be eating. Our schools and colleges have come to rely on the revenue from the peddlers of junk food. Shouldnt we have the right to demand that some of this revenue is put directly into education on nutrition and the availability, even promotion of a balanced diet? Shouldnt we be teaching children about a diet that includes, high fiber and natural energy giving foods. A diet that is low in calories and saturated fats is better for us. Vegetables are a major source of our protein and vitamins. We should be incorporating these into our daily intake. We should not just rely on a small printed list on the side of a carton that we do not even understand. Obesity and disease will not vanish purely as a result of a healthy diet. Exercise should be incorporated too. A healthier diet though, is a major start.
Knowledge is good, but it is not enough. After all whatever we say, if junk food is all that is on offer, what kind of choice is that? The US government does spend money on promoting healthy eating. A mere one million dollars compared to more than a billion dollars spent by one fast food chain alone in promoting its products. Our government needs to initiate campaigns and policies to enable people to eat well and be active. Above all we need to clamp down on the junk food ads. We must try to eat healthier.
You must find out what exactly you are eating. Make it your business to know what is going into your system. You will feel better for it. You will look better for it. Who knows you might even be able to think with a razor sharp mind. Then youd know that in eating junk food you are killing yourself with kindness. Perhaps then youd reach for the ultimate in pre-packed snacks, a banana!
Please note that this sample paper on Junk Food is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Junk Food, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Junk Food will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Read more
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Junk Food, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Junk Food paper at affordable prices with !
Junk Food Killing Ourselves with Generosity
Feeling hungry? How about pizza, burgers, French fries and cola, or chicken patties, deep-fried? Are you thirsty? Then how about a milk shake or soda? Perhaps you want something sweet? Candy bars and crisps should do the trick. The truth is we love fast food. We love it even more if its deep fried in fat, full of salt, stacked with sugar and countless numbers not to mention flavored pulp.
There are over 00,000 fast food outlets in the US alone. Fast food, junk food, call it what you like, but its taking over our world. Junk food is fast, convenient, sadly predictable and everywhere. Our nutrition comes in a box, our thirst is quenched in a carton. No matter where we are in the world it seems junk food is there to comfort us. We think we know what were getting and we like it very much.
The only trouble is, junk food just does not feel the same way about us. Nutrition experts tell us that fast food is often high in calories, sodium, fat and cholesterol. Who cares? It tastes good and it smells good. How bad can that be? After all, its all around us, frozen in the supermarket and stacked in vending machines. We see the proof of our addictions, flashed across our TV screens hourly. The key words are Quick and Tasty and wherever we are, its never very far away.
National conglomerates spend millions endorsing games and toys with their drinks and burgers. Surely they wouldnt try and sell us food that is bad for us? These same companies give even more millions to our schools and colleges. Theyre funding our lifestyles and education. All the schools and colleges have to do is ensure we have easy access to that vending machine at all times of the day. All we have to do is to buy and eat and drink the cheap colourful products stacked up inside. Everyday and all day that is exactly what we do.
How wonderful this is on the cusp of the twenty first century. After all our time is in such short supply. We dont have time to cook. Were busy people, freed from the labour of the kitchen. Ping! That microwave meal is ready. The re-cycled packaging is already in the trash. The TV dinner soon consumed, we slump on the couch our only exercise being to switch the remote control.
How many of us realize that our diet and the way we eat and promote fast food is doing us serious damage? The US Department of Health and Human Services estimates that half a million deaths annually are due to cancer, heart disease, strokes and diabetes. They say that these deaths are directly linked to what we are eating. The fact is junk food kills as many Americans as tobacco.
It doesnt seem to matter to us that both tooth decay and obesity are on the rise in teens and adults. According to the Center for disease Control and Prevention more than half of all adults are now overweight or obese. Obesity rates in children and teens have doubled in size since the late 170s. Their problems with heart disease are all in the future. The funny clown wont be around by then. Hell be close to death, his arteries clogged up. His cardiovascular disease will be about to finish him off. This will be as a result of a process that will have started when he was five or six, a process that once begun, is irreversible. His bones will be brittle and weak. His teeth will have fallen out. Still, maybe hell still be able to polish off a milk shake flavored with a spoonful of pulp.
One average burger meal contains, hidden amongst the beef and cereals, additives and flavorings, ten teaspoons of salt. Ten! Trying eating that on its own and see how you feel. Theres enough sugar in a soda, along with the fruit pulp, to fill up your hands. How about that for healthy food? Now pile on the spoonfuls of fat that make up burgers and candy alike. Would you want to feed that to a child? Would you even eat it yourself?
We know that smoking is bad for us, though it was not always thought so. We know that drinking alcohol causes major damage and impairment to our bodies. We dont offer young children and teens these lethal toxic substances. Surely we should at least try and stop them filling up their bodies with unnecessary and harmful food and drink.
Kids love fast food. We treat them to it. Its all around them. Its not bad in moderation or as part of a balanced diet, say the experts. The truth is most of us have no idea what a balanced diet is. Kids love fast food because its all they see. They are being manipulated with advertising and so are we. Researchers at the University of Toronto have discovered that fat rich diets are not only bad for your heart, liver and teeth; they may also impair essential brain functions like concentration and memory. The quick fix buzz we get from eating sugar-drenched candy, is exactly that, a quick fix. Soon after we slump and become lethargic.
We all want to do right by our children and ourselves. Parents find it a continual struggle to encourage healthy eating habits. They are up against fierce competition in this hectic day and age. Pretty soon there will be a generation of parents who will never know what life was like before the advent of burger chains and fast food outlets. Ill health and obesity will be normal. High blood pressure and coronary disease will be rife.
It does not have to be so! Education is the key. We should make it our business to find out what we are eating and what we should be eating. Our schools and colleges have come to rely on the revenue from the peddlers of junk food. Shouldnt we have the right to demand that some of this revenue is put directly into education on nutrition and the availability, even promotion of a balanced diet? Shouldnt we be teaching children about a diet that includes, high fiber and natural energy giving foods. A diet that is low in calories and saturated fats is better for us. Vegetables are a major source of our protein and vitamins. We should be incorporating these into our daily intake. We should not just rely on a small printed list on the side of a carton that we do not even understand. Obesity and disease will not vanish purely as a result of a healthy diet. Exercise should be incorporated too. A healthier diet though, is a major start.
Knowledge is good, but it is not enough. After all whatever we say, if junk food is all that is on offer, what kind of choice is that? The US government does spend money on promoting healthy eating. A mere one million dollars compared to more than a billion dollars spent by one fast food chain alone in promoting its products. Our government needs to initiate campaigns and policies to enable people to eat well and be active. Above all we need to clamp down on the junk food ads. We must try to eat healthier.
You must find out what exactly you are eating. Make it your business to know what is going into your system. You will feel better for it. You will look better for it. Who knows you might even be able to think with a razor sharp mind. Then youd know that in eating junk food you are killing yourself with kindness. Perhaps then youd reach for the ultimate in pre-packed snacks, a banana!
Please note that this sample paper on Junk Food is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Junk Food, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Junk Food will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
