If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Forgiveness. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Forgiveness paper right on time.
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Forgiveness, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Forgiveness paper at affordable prices !
The act of forgiveness usually involves two or more parties, in which case, the victim or victims can choose to or not to forgive the wrongdoer for his or her wrongdoings. In today’s society, one usually does not forgive another until they feel that some sense of justice has been served, be it that the wrongdoer has served their time for this wrongful act, or they have given a simple apology. “My Brother’s Guilt Became My Own,” by Bill Babbit, tells the story of how he tried to take care of his younger brother Manny and in turn, caused his brother’s death. In Trudy Govier’s “Forgiveness and the Unforgivable,” she speaks on different scenarios of forgiveness and what seems to be forgivable and what is not. Trudy Govier speaks of different scenarios of forgiveness. She specifically touches on three of these scenarios The Classic Scenario, Quasi-Forgiveness, and Unilateral Forgiveness. Although the law punishes offenders for their unjust acts, are these offenders really always so unforgivable? Not always. When the offender does not repent for their acts, then they are not forgivable, but if they do repent, they may be forgivable, but not to the point where they can go without being punished. When it comes to justice, forgiveness does not always make everything all right.
In The Classic Scenario, it is said that, “A wrongdoer, or offender, may come to realize that he has done something wrong and to feel sorry about it. He is prepared to acknowledge his wrongdoing; he repents, approaching the victim to apologize and ask for forgiveness. If she takes the offender’s expressions of remorse to be genuine and sincere, the victim may be prepared to forgive him…” This scenario took place between Bill and Manny. Manny forgave Bill for turning him in to the authorities. He did not forget what he did, but he chose to let his angry feelings go and forgive Bill. Most people do not “forgive and forget,” they simply choose to stop resenting their wrongdoer. Leah never got the chance to forgive Manny, because was dead. Leah’s family and society had the chance to forgive Manny, but it is unclear if they did or not.
Piers Benns scenario fits better with Manny and Leah’s situation. Piers Benn argues his case in the case of Quasi-Forgiveness. He says that “it is the victim and only the victim who is properly entitled to forgive an offender, and if someone is not entitled to forgive another, he cannot do it.” This does seem to make sense, but what if the victim is deceased? Is it so that offenders can never be forgiven and will always be seen as” objects of moral indignation?” No, there are also “secondary and tertiary victims,” whom are perfectly capable of forgiving. These secondary and tertiary victims are the friends, family, and the community that were left behind by the deceased. Manny took the life of Leah Schendel. It is not evident if Leah’s family and friends forgave Manny for taking her life, but when it comes to Bill being forgiven for turning Manny in, he was forgiven. Yes Manny did forgive Bill for turning him in, but Manny was not able to forgive Bill for him being executed. The secondary victims being Bill’s mother and siblings forgave him and Bill hopes that Manny’s children will forgive him. Most likely, society will forgive Bill because Manny is no longer a threat. In this case, someone other than the direct victim is able to forgive.
In the last scenario, Unilateral Forgiveness, Margaret Homlgren says that, “…victims of wrongdoing must work through a process of responding to that wrongdoing in order to reach a state of genuine forgiveness. The process is central to the restoration of a victim’s self- respect, and forgiveness is psychologically and ethically inappropriate whenever it is incomplete. But once this process is complete, Holmgren argues forgiveness is always appropriate, whether the offender repents or not.” This is not always correct. Just because the offender has gone through the punishment issued to them for their acts, this does not make him or her forgivable. It is one thing if the offender shows remorse and is genuinely sorry for what they did. Depending on the crime, they may deserve forgiveness, but if they do not forgive at all, they are almost certain not to be forgiven.
Order Custom Essay on Forgiveness
This is Bill’s situation. Bill forgave Manny for killing Leah, but many will say that Bill was wrong for turning his brother in without taking the proper steps in the process such as having a lawyer present. Bill’s process of responding to his wrongdoing was the grief that he endured before and even after his brother’s death. In this situation, Holmgren’s theory is correct because Manny chose to forgive Bill. Manny’s forgiving Bill helped Bill to forgive himself for what he did. Bill forgave Manny for what he did, but his forgiveness did nothing to help the situation because Manny still lost his life.
Manny’s situation is a little different when it comes to his victims. It is understandable for Leah’s family and even society to choose not to forgive Manny for Leah’s death, but the state is a different story. The government knew of Manny’s psychological problems, but they still executed him. If anyone should have forgiven Manny, it should have been the government. They should have been able to look at the big picture and see that Manny did not mean to do what he did.
It is when the offender has a sort of “kiss my ass” mentality, that they do not deserve forgiveness. This is not the case with Manny. He killed, Leah Schendel, yes this is a fact, but does that mean he was not sorry for it? Manny had psychological issues in which caused him to commit this crime. Manny was executed, and therefore he has responded to his wrongdoing. But was this necessary? Now not only do we have a woman who has lost her life, we now have a man who made a terrible mistake without his life as well. Nothing has been accomplished.
All in all, these scenarios of forgiveness do not always work the way that they are designed to work. When one grants forgiveness, that does not necessarily mean that they have forgotten or that the offender does not need to be punished for what they have done. The victim simply acknowledges the fact that the offender is sorry. If the offender does not show remorse, they are likely not to be forgiven. Essentially it is completely up to the victim(s) whether or not to forgive.
Please note that this sample paper on Forgiveness is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Forgiveness, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Forgiveness will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
